• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Reliability of the detailed assessment of speed of handwriting on Flemish children.

作者信息

Simons Johan, Probst Michel

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.

出版信息

Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014 Fall;26(3):318-24. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000050.

DOI:10.1097/PEP.0000000000000050
PMID:24979085
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the reliability of the Detailed Assessment of Speed of Handwriting (DASH) in a Dutch-speaking sample of children.

METHODS

The sample included 650 boys and 513 girls (age range = 9-16 years). Handwriting speed measurements were obtained using the DASH. Interrater agreement, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency were calculated; gender and age effects were analyzed.

RESULTS

Interrater agreement shows excellent reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients of at least 0.94. Test-retest correlations ranged from r = 0.65 to r = 0.81. The internal consistency measures, calculated with Cronbach's alpha, were between 0.88 and 0.94. Both gender and age have a significant effect on handwriting speed, with F (7.1144) = 17.43 (P < .001) for gender and F (7.1144) = 21.8 (P < .001) for age.

CONCLUSION

The DASH is a reliable assessment tool to evaluate handwriting speed of Dutch-speaking children. There is a tendency of girls to write faster than boys.

摘要

相似文献

1
Reliability of the detailed assessment of speed of handwriting on Flemish children.
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014 Fall;26(3):318-24. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000050.
2
Assessing handwriting speed of children biliterate in English and Chinese.评估精通英文和中文的儿童的书写速度。
Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Apr;96(2):685-94. doi: 10.2466/pms.2003.96.2.685.
3
SOS: a screening instrument to identify children with handwriting impairments.SOS:一种用于识别有书写障碍儿童的筛查工具。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2012 Aug;32(3):306-19. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2012.678971. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
4
Comparison of the Properties of the Handwriting Speed Test (HST) and Detailed Assessment of Speed of Handwriting (DASH): An Exploratory Study.手写速度测试(HST)与手写速度详细评估(DASH)的属性比较:一项探索性研究。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2017 May;37(2):155-169. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2016.1185499. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
5
Reliability and validity of Handwriting Test for Preschool Children (HT-PRE): A new tool to assess the handwriting ability of preschool children aged 5-6 years old in Mainland China.《学龄前儿童书写测试(HT-PRE)的信度和效度:中国大陆 5-6 岁学龄前儿童书写能力评估的新工具》。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0229786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229786. eCollection 2020.
6
Development, reliability, and validity of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire (HPSQ).手写能力筛查问卷(HPSQ)的编制、信度及效度
Am J Occup Ther. 2008 May-Jun;62(3):298-307. doi: 10.5014/ajot.62.3.298.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the dutch version of the assessment of preschool children's participation (APCP): construct validity and test-retest reliability.荷兰语版学前儿童参与评估量表(APCP)的心理测量学评估:结构效度和重测信度。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2013 Nov;33(4):372-83. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2013.764958. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
8
High-Level Mobility Assessment Tool (HiMAT): interrater reliability, retest reliability, and internal consistency.高级移动性评估工具(HiMAT):评分者间信度、重测信度和内部一致性
Phys Ther. 2006 Mar;86(3):395-400.
9
Commentary on "reliability of the detailed assessment of speed of handwriting on Flemish children".关于“佛兰芒儿童笔迹速度详细评估的可靠性”的评论
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014 Fall;26(3):324. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000056.
10
Inter-rater reliability of three adult handwriting legibility instruments.三种成人笔迹易读性评估工具的评分者间信度
Aust Occup Ther J. 2012 Oct;59(5):347-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2012.01035.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Handwriting in primary school: comparing standardized tests and evaluating impact of grapho-motor parameters.小学阶段的书写:比较标准化测试并评估书写运动参数的影响。
Read Writ. 2025;38(5):1409-1434. doi: 10.1007/s11145-024-10562-3. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
2
In-hand manipulation assessment instruments for children: A scoping review.儿童手部操作评估工具:一项范围综述
Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Feb;85(2):83-98. doi: 10.1177/03080226211037859. Epub 2021 Nov 23.