Suppr超能文献

工作相关社会心理因素与缺血性心脏病发病情况的最新进展:一项系统综述

Update on work-related psychosocial factors and the development of ischemic heart disease: a systematic review.

作者信息

Pejtersen Jan Hyld, Burr Hermann, Hannerz Harald, Fishta Alba, Hurwitz Eller Nanna

机构信息

From the *The Danish National Centre for Social Research, Copenhagen, Denmark; †Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Berlin, Germany; ‡National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Cardiol Rev. 2015 Mar-Apr;23(2):94-8. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000033.

Abstract

The present review deals with the relationship between occupational psychosocial factors and the incidence of ischemic heart disease (IHD) with special regard to the statistical power of the findings. This review with 4 inclusion criteria is an update of a 2009 review of which the first 3 criteria were included in the original review: (1) STUDY: a prospective or case-control study if exposure was not self-reported (prognostic studies excluded); (2) OUTCOME: definite IHD determined externally; (3) EXPOSURE: psychosocial factors at work (excluding shift work, trauma, violence or accidents, and social capital); and (4) Statistical power: acceptable to detect a 20% increased risk in IHD. Eleven new papers met the inclusion criteria 1-3; a total of 44 papers were evaluated regarding inclusion criteria 4. Of 169 statistical analyses, only 10 analyses in 2 papers had acceptable statistical power. The results of the 2 papers pointed in the same direction, namely that only the control dimension of job strain explained the excess risk for myocardial infarction for job strain. The large number of underpowered studies and the focus on psychosocial models, such as the job strain models, make it difficult to determine to what extent psychosocial factors at work are risk factors of IHD. There is a need for considering statistical power when planning studies.

摘要

本综述探讨职业心理社会因素与缺血性心脏病(IHD)发病率之间的关系,并特别关注研究结果的统计效力。本综述有4项纳入标准,是对2009年综述的更新,其中前3项标准包含在原综述中:(1)研究:如果暴露不是自我报告的,则为前瞻性研究或病例对照研究(排除预后研究);(2)结局:外部确定的明确IHD;(3)暴露:工作中的心理社会因素(不包括轮班工作、创伤、暴力或事故以及社会资本);(4)统计效力:能够检测出IHD风险增加20%的可接受水平。11篇新论文符合纳入标准1-3;共有44篇论文就纳入标准4进行了评估。在169项统计分析中,只有2篇论文中的10项分析具有可接受的统计效力。这2篇论文的结果指向同一方向,即只有工作压力的控制维度解释了工作压力导致心肌梗死的额外风险。大量研究统计效力不足,且专注于心理社会模型(如工作压力模型),这使得难以确定工作中的心理社会因素在多大程度上是IHD的风险因素。在规划研究时需要考虑统计效力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验