Kim Dae-Hyun, Cha Jae-Kwan, Park Hyun-Seok, Choi Jae-Hyung, Kang Myung-Jin, Huh Jae-Taeck
Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, 1, 3-ga Dongdaesin-dong, Seo-gu, Busan 602-715, Republic of Korea; Busan-Ulsan Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Center, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Dong-A University, 1, 3-ga Dongdaesin-dong, Seo-gu, Busan 602-715, Republic of Korea; Busan-Ulsan Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Center, Busan, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Aug;21(8):1428-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.03.014. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
Referral from other hospitals is one of the primary causes of delayed thrombolysis therapy after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We aimed to evaluate whether direct access to a hospital offering intravenous thrombolysis therapy was associated with good functional outcome in AIS patients treated with thrombolysis. We enrolled patients who received intravenous thrombolysis within 3 hours of symptom onset at our stroke center. We divided these patients into two groups: those with a direct admission to our stroke center and those with indirect admission by referral from other community hospitals. We investigated onset-to-door time and onset-to-recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) time according to admission mode. We then assessed the association between a direct admission and favorable outcome at 90 days. A total of 232 patients (mean age of 66.6 years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 10) were included. A total of 48.7% of AIS patients treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy were transferred from other hospitals. Patients who were directly admitted to our stroke center had a shorter onset-to-door time (61 versus 120 minutes, p<0.001) and onset-to-rtPA time (103 versus 155 minutes, p<0.001) than those referred from other hospitals. Direct admission was associated with a good outcome with an odds ratio of 2.03 (95% confidence interval 1.051-3.917, p=0.035), after adjusting for baseline variables. Thrombolysis after direct admission to a hospital offering intravenous thrombolysis therapy could shorten onset-to-rtPA time and improve stroke outcome in patients with AIS.
来自其他医院的转诊是急性缺血性卒中(AIS)后溶栓治疗延迟的主要原因之一。我们旨在评估直接前往提供静脉溶栓治疗的医院就诊是否与接受溶栓治疗的AIS患者的良好功能预后相关。我们纳入了在我们的卒中中心症状发作3小时内接受静脉溶栓治疗的患者。我们将这些患者分为两组:直接入住我们卒中中心的患者和由其他社区医院转诊间接入住的患者。我们根据入院方式调查了症状发作至入院时间和症状发作至重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rtPA)时间。然后,我们评估了直接入院与90天时良好预后之间的关联。共纳入232例患者(平均年龄66.6岁,美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分中位数为10)。接受静脉溶栓治疗的AIS患者中共有48.7%是从其他医院转诊而来的。直接入住我们卒中中心的患者比从其他医院转诊而来的患者症状发作至入院时间更短(61分钟对120分钟,p<0.001),症状发作至rtPA时间也更短(103分钟对155分钟,p<0.001)。在对基线变量进行调整后,直接入院与良好预后相关,优势比为2.03(95%置信区间1.051 - 3.917,p = 0.035)。直接前往提供静脉溶栓治疗的医院就诊后进行溶栓治疗可缩短症状发作至rtPA时间,并改善AIS患者的卒中预后。