Department of Neurology, JingJiang People's Hospital, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, No. 28, Zhongzhou Road, Jingjiang, 214500, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Neurology, Zhoukou Central Hospital, Henan, China.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019 Nov;48(4):580-586. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01912-y.
We included acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who received recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) at three stroke centers via either interhospital transfer or direct presentation and compared the clinical outcomes and time metrics to analyze the impact of interhospital transfer on intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). We retrospectively enrolled patients with AIS admitted to three stroke centers from October 1, 2016, to June 1, 2018. Patients treated with rt-PA were classified into the transfer and direct groups. We collected the patients' general information and time points. Statistical analyses were conducted to examine differences in the clinical outcomes and time metrics between the two groups. A total of 326 patients were enrolled, including 84 patients in the transfer group and 242 in the direct group. The transfer group had a longer onset-to-door time (OTD) (124.5 ± 50.6 min versus 83.2 ± 47.2 min, P < 0.01) but a shorter door-to-needle time (DNT) (53.0 ± 26.3 min versus 81.5 ± 31.1 min, P < 0.01), and the stroke onset-to-needle time was 177.4 ± 51.0 min versus 164.7 ± 53.3 min (P = 0.057). Compared with the direct group, the transfer group achieved similar modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-2 outcomes (59.5% versus 58.7%, P = 0.768). Interhospital transfer was not an independent risk factor associated with a poor outcome at 90 days. In three Chinese municipal stroke centers, patients with an AIS referral have a longer OTD but a shorter DNT. DNTs of municipal hospitals were far longer than the current international standard, and their improvement is an important task.
我们纳入了通过院内转院或直接就诊在三个卒中中心接受重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)治疗的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者,并比较了临床结局和时间指标,以分析院际转院对静脉溶栓(IVT)的影响。我们回顾性纳入了 2016 年 10 月 1 日至 2018 年 6 月 1 日期间在三个卒中中心就诊的 AIS 患者。接受 rt-PA 治疗的患者被分为转院组和直接组。我们收集了患者的一般信息和时间点。进行统计学分析以检查两组间临床结局和时间指标的差异。共纳入 326 例患者,其中转院组 84 例,直接组 242 例。转院组的发病至门时间(OTD)较长(124.5±50.6 分钟与 83.2±47.2 分钟,P<0.01),但门至针时间(DNT)较短(53.0±26.3 分钟与 81.5±31.1 分钟,P<0.01),发病至针时间为 177.4±51.0 分钟与 164.7±53.3 分钟(P=0.057)。与直接组相比,转院组获得相似的改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)0-2 结局(59.5%与 58.7%,P=0.768)。院际转院不是 90 天预后不良的独立危险因素。在三个中国市级卒中中心,AIS 转诊患者的 OTD 较长,但 DNT 较短。市级医院的 DNTs 远长于当前的国际标准,改善这一情况是一项重要任务。