Moro Maria F, Carta Mauro G, Pintus Mirra, Pintus Elisa, Melis Riccardo, Kapczinski Flavio, Vieta Eduard, Colom Francesc
Department of Public Health and Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Cagliari, Italy.
Bipolar Disorders Program and Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Ramiro Barcelos 2350, 90035-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2014 Jun 13;10:48-52. doi: 10.2174/1745017901410010048. eCollection 2014.
Abnormalities in biological rhythms (BR) may have a role in the pathophysiology of Bipolar Disorders (BD). The objective of this study is to validate the Italian version of the Biological Rhythms Interview of Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (BRIAN), a useful tool in studying BR, and measure its accuracy in discriminating BD.
44 outpatients with DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of BD and 38 controls balanced for sex and age were consecutively recruited. The discriminant validity of BRIAN for the screening of BD and its test re-test reliability in two evaluations were assessed.
BD patients scored 22.22±11.19 in BRIAN against 7.13±5.6 of the control group (P<0.0001). BRIAN showed a good accuracy to screen between BD non-BD at cutoff 16, a sensitivity was 68.2 and specificity was 92.5. The test-retest stability measured using Pearson's coefficient found very high r values for each section and the total score, thus indicating a correlation at the two times of statistical significance in all measures. Cohen's Kappa varied from 0.47 in the sociality section to 0.80 in the sleep section, with a total K mean of 0.65.
The results show that the Italian version of BRIAN has good discriminant validity in detecting BD from healthy controls and shows good test-retest reliability. The study suggests the possibility of developing mixed screening tools by introducing items on dysregulation of biological rhythms to the usual measures of mood.
生物节律(BR)异常可能在双相情感障碍(BD)的病理生理学中起作用。本研究的目的是验证神经精神病学中生物节律评估访谈(BRIAN)的意大利语版本,这是一种研究生物节律的有用工具,并测量其在鉴别双相情感障碍方面的准确性。
连续招募44名符合DSM-IV-TR双相情感障碍诊断标准的门诊患者和38名年龄和性别匹配的对照组。评估了BRIAN在筛查双相情感障碍方面的判别效度及其在两次评估中的重测信度。
双相情感障碍患者在BRIAN中的得分为22.22±11.19,而对照组为7.13±5.6(P<0.0001)。BRIAN在截断值为16时,对双相情感障碍与非双相情感障碍的筛查具有良好的准确性,敏感性为68.2,特异性为92.5。使用皮尔逊系数测量的重测稳定性发现,每个部分和总分的r值都非常高,这表明在所有测量中两次测量之间具有统计学意义的相关性。科恩kappa系数从社交性部分的0.47到睡眠部分的0.80不等,总K均值为0.65。
结果表明,BRIAN的意大利语版本在从健康对照中检测双相情感障碍方面具有良好的判别效度,并显示出良好的重测信度。该研究表明,通过在通常的情绪测量中引入生物节律失调的项目,有可能开发混合筛查工具。