Pegu Amarendra, Yang Zhi-yong, Boyington Jeffrey C, Wu Lan, Ko Sung-Youl, Schmidt Stephen D, McKee Krisha, Kong Wing-Pui, Shi Wei, Chen Xuejun, Todd John-Paul, Letvin Norman L, Huang Jinghe, Nason Martha C, Hoxie James A, Kwong Peter D, Connors Mark, Rao Srinivas S, Mascola John R, Nabel Gary J
Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 40 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Vaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), 40 Convent Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Division of Viral Pathogenesis, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, RE113, P. O. Box 15732, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Jul 2;6(243):243ra88. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008992.
HIV-1 infection depends on effective viral entry mediated by the interaction of its envelope (Env) glycoprotein with specific cell surface receptors. Protective antiviral antibodies generated by passive or active immunization must prevent these interactions. Because the HIV-1 Env is highly variable, attention has also focused on blocking the HIV-1 primary cell receptor CD4. We therefore analyzed the in vivo protective efficacy of three potent neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to HIV-1 Env compared to an antibody against the CD4 receptor. Protection was assessed after mucosal challenge of rhesus macaques with simian/HIV (SHIV). Despite its comparable or greater neutralization potency in vitro, the anti-CD4 antibody did not provide effective protection in vivo, whereas the HIV-1-specific mAbs VRC01, 10E8, and PG9, targeting the CD4 binding site, membrane-proximal, and V1V2 glycan Env regions, respectively, conferred complete protection, albeit at different relative potencies. These findings demonstrate the protective efficacy of broadly neutralizing antibodies directed to the HIV-1 Env and suggest that targeting the HIV-1 Env is preferable to the cell surface receptor CD4 for the prevention of HIV-1 transmission.
HIV-1感染依赖于其包膜(Env)糖蛋白与特定细胞表面受体相互作用介导的有效病毒进入。被动或主动免疫产生的保护性抗病毒抗体必须阻止这些相互作用。由于HIV-1 Env高度可变,注意力也集中在阻断HIV-1主要细胞受体CD4上。因此,我们分析了三种强效抗HIV-1 Env中和单克隆抗体(mAb)与一种抗CD4受体抗体相比的体内保护效果。在用猿猴/人免疫缺陷病毒(SHIV)对恒河猴进行黏膜攻击后评估保护效果。尽管抗CD4抗体在体外具有相当或更高的中和效力,但在体内并未提供有效的保护,而分别靶向CD4结合位点、膜近端和V1V2聚糖Env区域的HIV-1特异性mAb VRC01、10E8和PG9,尽管相对效力不同,但都提供了完全保护。这些发现证明了针对HIV-1 Env的广泛中和抗体的保护效果,并表明针对HIV-1 Env预防HIV-1传播比针对细胞表面受体CD4更可取。