Tudor-Locke Catrine, Hendrick Chelsea A, Duet Megan T, Swift Damon L, Schuna John M, Martin Corby K, Johnson William D, Church Timothy S
Pennington Biomedical Research Center, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2014 Oct;39(10):1104-11. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2013-0435. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
We report experiences, observations, and general lessons learned, specifically with regards to participant recruitment and adherence, while implementing a 6-month randomized controlled treadmill desk intervention (the WorkStation Pilot Study) in a real-world office-based health insurance workplace. Despite support from the company's upper administration, relatively few employees responded to the company-generated e-mail to participate in the study. Ultimately only 41 overweight/obese participants were deemed eligible and enrolled from a recruitment pool of 728 workers. Participants allocated to the Treadmill Desk Group found the treadmill desk difficult to use for 45 min twice a day as scheduled. Overall attendance averaged 45%-50% of all possible scheduled sessions. The most frequently reported reasons for missing sessions included work conflict (35%), out of office (30%), and illness/injury/drop-out (20%). Although focus groups indicated consistently positive comments about treadmill desks, an apparent challenge was fitting a rigid schedule of shared use to an equally rigid and demanding work schedule punctuated with numerous tasks and obligations that could not easily be interrupted. Regardless, we documented that sedentary office workers average ∼43 min of light-intensity (∼2 METs) treadmill walking daily in response to a scheduled, facilitated, and shared access workplace intervention. Workstation alternatives that combine computer-based work with light-intensity physical activity are a potential solution to health problems associated with excessive sedentary behavior; however, there are numerous administrative, capital, and human resource challenges confronting employers considering providing treadmill desks to workers in a cost-effective and equitable manner.
我们报告了在一家基于办公室的真实世界医疗保险工作场所实施为期6个月的随机对照跑步机办公桌干预(工作站试点研究)时的经验、观察结果和总结的一般经验教训,特别是在参与者招募和坚持方面。尽管得到了公司高层管理的支持,但相对较少的员工回复了公司发送的参与研究的电子邮件。最终,在728名员工的招募池中,只有41名超重/肥胖参与者被认为符合条件并被纳入研究。被分配到跑步机办公桌组的参与者发现,按照计划每天使用跑步机办公桌两次、每次45分钟很困难。总体出勤率平均为所有可能安排的课程的45%-50%。最常报告的错过课程的原因包括工作冲突(35%)、不在办公室(30%)以及疾病/受伤/退出(20%)。尽管焦点小组对跑步机办公桌一直给出积极评价,但一个明显的挑战是,要将严格的共享使用时间表与同样严格且要求高的工作日程相匹配,工作日程中穿插着众多不易被打断的任务和职责。无论如何,我们记录到,久坐的办公室工作人员在一项有计划、便利且共享使用的工作场所干预措施下,平均每天在跑步机上进行约43分钟的低强度(约2代谢当量)步行。将基于计算机的工作与低强度体育活动相结合的工作站替代方案,是解决与久坐行为过多相关健康问题的一个潜在办法;然而,雇主若要以具有成本效益且公平的方式为员工提供跑步机办公桌,会面临众多行政、资金和人力资源方面的挑战。