Koyyalamudi Veerandra B, Arulkumar Sailesh, Yost Benjamin R, Fox Charles J, Urman Richard D, Kaye Alan David
Department of Anesthesiology, LSUHSC-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Jun;28(2):127-38. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 May 9.
There has been a renewed interest in supraclavicular and paravertebral blocks for regional anesthesia. Studies have shown a high block success rate with the supraclavicular approach to the brachial plexus. Despite the use of ultrasound, pleural puncture and pneumothorax may still occur. The supraclavicular block is associated with a higher incidence of phrenic nerve paralysis and caution should be exercised in patients with respiratory difficulties. Paravertebral blocks have been used successfully to provide analgesia and anesthesia for a variety of surgical procedures. When compared to thoracic epidural blockade for thoracic surgery, paravertebral blockade provides comparable analgesia with a better preservation of pulmonary function and a lower incidence of hypotension. This brings forth the question as to whether paravertebral blocks have replaced epidural blockade as the gold standard in perioperative pain management for thoracoabdominal procedures.
对于区域麻醉而言,人们对锁骨上阻滞和椎旁阻滞又重新产生了兴趣。研究表明,采用锁骨上入路进行臂丛神经阻滞的成功率很高。尽管使用了超声,但仍可能发生胸膜穿刺和气胸。锁骨上阻滞与膈神经麻痹的发生率较高相关,对于有呼吸困难的患者应谨慎使用。椎旁阻滞已成功用于为各种外科手术提供镇痛和麻醉。与胸段硬膜外阻滞用于胸科手术相比,椎旁阻滞提供了相当的镇痛效果,同时能更好地保留肺功能,且低血压发生率较低。这就引出了一个问题,即椎旁阻滞是否已取代硬膜外阻滞,成为胸腹手术围手术期疼痛管理的金标准。