锁骨上阻滞和椎旁阻滞:在围手术期镇痛中,我们是否未充分利用这些区域技术?

Supraclavicular and paravertebral blocks: Are we underutilizing these regional techniques in perioperative analgesia?

作者信息

Koyyalamudi Veerandra B, Arulkumar Sailesh, Yost Benjamin R, Fox Charles J, Urman Richard D, Kaye Alan David

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, LSUHSC-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Jun;28(2):127-38. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 May 9.

Abstract

There has been a renewed interest in supraclavicular and paravertebral blocks for regional anesthesia. Studies have shown a high block success rate with the supraclavicular approach to the brachial plexus. Despite the use of ultrasound, pleural puncture and pneumothorax may still occur. The supraclavicular block is associated with a higher incidence of phrenic nerve paralysis and caution should be exercised in patients with respiratory difficulties. Paravertebral blocks have been used successfully to provide analgesia and anesthesia for a variety of surgical procedures. When compared to thoracic epidural blockade for thoracic surgery, paravertebral blockade provides comparable analgesia with a better preservation of pulmonary function and a lower incidence of hypotension. This brings forth the question as to whether paravertebral blocks have replaced epidural blockade as the gold standard in perioperative pain management for thoracoabdominal procedures.

摘要

对于区域麻醉而言,人们对锁骨上阻滞和椎旁阻滞又重新产生了兴趣。研究表明,采用锁骨上入路进行臂丛神经阻滞的成功率很高。尽管使用了超声,但仍可能发生胸膜穿刺和气胸。锁骨上阻滞与膈神经麻痹的发生率较高相关,对于有呼吸困难的患者应谨慎使用。椎旁阻滞已成功用于为各种外科手术提供镇痛和麻醉。与胸段硬膜外阻滞用于胸科手术相比,椎旁阻滞提供了相当的镇痛效果,同时能更好地保留肺功能,且低血压发生率较低。这就引出了一个问题,即椎旁阻滞是否已取代硬膜外阻滞,成为胸腹手术围手术期疼痛管理的金标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索