MacAskill S G, Hastings G B, McNeill R E, Gillon J
Department of Marketing, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
BMJ. 1989 Apr 15;298(6679):1012-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6679.1012.
To see whether the issue of AIDS has influenced the observed decline in blood donation in Scotland.
Two methods: a quantitative survey using personal interviews based on a questionnaire and a qualitative survey based on group discussions.
Interviews based on the questionnaire were conducted in the respondents' homes. The group discussions were held in the homes of professional market research interviewers.
For the quantitative survey a representative sample of 976 Scottish adults was selected by multistage sampling. In the qualitative survey 16 groups of five to eight respondents assigned according to donating experience and sociodemographic criteria took part.
AIDS was not mentioned as a discouraging factor in donation, and off putting aspects identified before AIDS became a public issue remained salient--for example, fear of needles. Many (75%) thought it unlikely that donation entailed a risk of developing AIDS. Nevertheless, respondents were reluctant to consider the AIDS issue personally. Being asked to do so, as in the routine screening of donors, aroused fears and resentment.
The issue of AIDS, including fear of infection, has not directly influenced the declining numbers of donors, but the unpleasant associations of AIDS have had an indirect effect, particularly in undermining the emotional benefits of giving blood. For example, the screening process, which requires potential donors to consider their personal risk from AIDS, had had the effect of discouraging donors in general. Redressing the balance is difficult as screening must be universally applied. Rather than minimising the issue of AIDS, publicity needs urgently to reassert the positive benefits of and rewards from giving blood.
探究艾滋病问题是否对苏格兰献血人数的下降产生了影响。
两种方法:一是基于问卷调查的个人访谈定量调查,二是基于小组讨论的定性调查。
基于问卷的访谈在受访者家中进行。小组讨论在专业市场研究访谈人员家中举行。
定量调查通过多阶段抽样选取了976名具有代表性的苏格兰成年人作为样本。定性调查有16组,每组五至八名受访者,他们根据献血经历和社会人口统计学标准进行分配。
艾滋病未被提及为献血的阻碍因素,在艾滋病成为公共问题之前就已确定的令人反感的方面仍然很突出,例如对针头的恐惧。许多人(75%)认为献血不太可能导致感染艾滋病的风险。然而,受访者不愿亲自考虑艾滋病问题。像在对献血者进行常规筛查时那样被要求考虑这个问题,会引发恐惧和不满。
艾滋病问题,包括对感染的恐惧,并未直接影响献血人数的下降,但艾滋病令人不快的关联产生了间接影响,尤其是在削弱献血的情感益处方面。例如,筛查过程要求潜在献血者考虑自身感染艾滋病的风险,总体上起到了使献血者却步的作用。由于筛查必须普遍实施,因此很难恢复平衡。宣传不应淡化艾滋病问题,而迫切需要重申献血的积极益处和回报。