Mohammadi Milad, Bergado-Acosta Jorge R, Fendt Markus
Institute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany; Integrative Neuroscience Program, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Institute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Behav Brain Res. 2014 Oct 1;272:40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.06.053. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
Aversive events induce aversive memories (fear learning) and can also establish appetitive memories. This is the case for cues associated with the cessation of an aversive event (relief learning) or occurring in an explicitly unpaired fashion (safety learning). However, the neural basis of relief and safety learning is poorly understood. In particular, it is not clear whether relief learning and safety learning are neuronally distinct. In the present study, we ask whether the nucleus accumbens is required for the acquisition of relief- and/or safety memory. Temporary inactivation of the nucleus accumbens by local injections of the GABA-A receptor agonist muscimol during the learning session abolished relief learning whereas safety learning was not affected. Thus, the requirement for a functional nucleus accumbens distinguishes relief from safety learning, showing that these two forms of learning are neuronally distinct.
厌恶事件会诱发厌恶记忆(恐惧学习),也能建立偏好记忆。与厌恶事件停止相关的线索(缓解学习)或以明确非配对方式出现的线索(安全学习)就是这种情况。然而,缓解学习和安全学习的神经基础却知之甚少。特别是,尚不清楚缓解学习和安全学习在神经元层面是否存在差异。在本研究中,我们探究了伏隔核对于缓解和/或安全记忆的获取是否是必需的。在学习过程中,通过局部注射GABA-A受体激动剂蝇蕈醇使伏隔核暂时失活,消除了缓解学习,而安全学习未受影响。因此,功能性伏隔核的需求将缓解学习与安全学习区分开来,表明这两种学习形式在神经元层面是不同的。