• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手动牙刷的菌斑清除效果与刷牙力度之间的关系。

Relationship between the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush and brushing force.

作者信息

Van der Weijden G A, Timmerman M F, Danser M M, Van der Velden U

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, ACTA, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Periodontol. 1998 May;25(5):413-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02464.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02464.x
PMID:9650879
Abstract

This survey investigated the association between the efficacy of plaque removal and toothbrushing forces during a normal brushing regime. The 94 subjects participating in this study were requested not to brush 24 h prior to the experiment. Panelists brushed for 1 min with a manual toothbrush. Before and after brushing, plaque was assessed using the Turesky modification of the Quigley & Hein plaque index. A second 1-min exercise of brushing was carried out to assess the toothbrushing force. The mean plaque reduction was 39%, with vestibular surfaces being cleaned most effective (69%) and the lingual surfaces the least (21%). The mean brushing force was 330 g. No correlation was observed between efficacy and brushing force (r=0.14, p=0.16). The relationship between pre- and post-brushing plaque was stronger (r=0.68, p<0.001). Multiple regression analysis entering squared values of force as an independent variable into the equation, indicated that the relation between efficacy and force was not linear. A curve could be fitted to the plot (p=0.0004), demonstrating that up to a certain level of force, an increase of force is associated with an increase in efficacy (r=0.33, p<0.01). Beyond this point, application of higher forces resulted in reduced efficacy (r=-0.49, p=0.03). As was calculated in this particular test this 'transition' level of force was 407.4 g. The absence of a correlation between brushing force and plaque removal efficacy suggests that in a 'user model' brushing situation, other factors than brushing force are of major influence on the amount of plaque removed.

摘要

本调查研究了在正常刷牙过程中,牙菌斑清除效果与刷牙力度之间的关联。参与本研究的94名受试者被要求在实验前24小时内不刷牙。小组成员使用手动牙刷刷牙1分钟。刷牙前后,使用Quigley & Hein菌斑指数的Turesky改良版评估牙菌斑。进行第二次1分钟的刷牙操作以评估刷牙力度。牙菌斑平均减少了39%,其中前庭面清洁效果最佳(69%),舌面最差(21%)。平均刷牙力度为330克。未观察到效果与刷牙力度之间的相关性(r = 0.14,p = 0.16)。刷牙前后牙菌斑之间的关系更强(r = 0.68,p < 0.001)。将力度的平方值作为自变量纳入方程的多元回归分析表明,效果与力度之间的关系不是线性的。可以拟合一条曲线(p = 0.0004),表明在一定力度水平之前,力度增加与效果增加相关(r = 0.33,p < 0.01)。超过这一点,施加更高的力度会导致效果降低(r = -0.49,p = 0.03)。在这个特定测试中计算得出,这个“转变”力度水平为407.4克。刷牙力度与牙菌斑清除效果之间缺乏相关性表明,在“用户模式”刷牙情况下,除刷牙力度外的其他因素对牙菌斑清除量有主要影响。

相似文献

1
Relationship between the plaque removal efficacy of a manual toothbrush and brushing force.手动牙刷的菌斑清除效果与刷牙力度之间的关系。
J Clin Periodontol. 1998 May;25(5):413-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02464.x.
2
Toothbrushing force in relation to plaque removal.与牙菌斑清除相关的刷牙力度
J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Aug;23(8):724-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1996.tb00601.x.
3
Clinical evaluation of the effects of a sonic toothbrush with ultrasound waveguide in disrupting plaque with and without bristle contact.带有超声波波导的声波牙刷在有刷毛接触和无刷毛接触情况下对牙菌斑清除效果的临床评估。
Am J Dent. 2008 Apr;21(2):83-7.
4
Effect of brushing force and time on plaque removal using a powered toothbrush.使用电动牙刷时刷牙力度和时间对牙菌斑清除的影响。
J Clin Periodontol. 2003 May;30(5):409-13. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.20008.x.
5
Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.两种牙菌斑指数在评估牙刷效果中的相关性。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006 Nov 1;7(5):1-9.
6
The effect of brushing time and dentifrice on dental plaque removal in vivo.刷牙时间和牙膏对体内牙菌斑清除的影响。
J Dent Hyg. 2009 Summer;83(3):111-6. Epub 2009 Aug 14.
7
Comparison of 2 electric toothbrushes in plaque-removing ability. Professional and supervised brushing.两种电动牙刷去除牙菌斑能力的比较。专业且有监督的刷牙。
J Clin Periodontol. 1995 Aug;22(8):648-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1995.tb00819.x.
8
Evaluation of the incidence of gingival abrasion as a result of toothbrushing.刷牙导致牙龈磨损发生率的评估。
J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Sep;25(9):701-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02510.x.
9
Plaque-removing efficacy of new and used manual toothbrushes--a professional brushing study.新、旧手动牙刷洁牙效果的比较——一项专业刷牙研究。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2013 Nov;11(4):237-43. doi: 10.1111/idh.12021. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
10
The safety and efficacy of a children's power toothbrush and a manual toothbrush in 6-11 year-olds.儿童电动牙刷和手动牙刷对6至11岁儿童的安全性和有效性。
Am J Dent. 2001 Aug;14(4):195-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Supra- and sub-gingival instrumentation of periodontitis with the adjunctive treatment of a chloramine - a one-year randomized clinical trial study.牙周炎龈上和龈下器械治疗联合氯胺辅助治疗——一项为期一年的随机临床试验研究
Acta Odontol Scand. 2024 Mar 22;83:1-6. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2023.2281486.
2
Impact of manual toothbrush design on plaque removal efficacy.手动牙刷设计对菌斑去除效果的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 25;23(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03518-6.
3
Modeling contact forces during human-robot interactions for performing activities of daily living.
在人类与机器人的日常互动中模拟接触力。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2023 Jul;237(7):829-840. doi: 10.1177/09544119231179568. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
4
Effect of Different Artificial Staining Procedures on the Color Stability and Translucency of a Nano-Hybrid Resin-Based Composite.不同人工染色程序对纳米混合树脂基复合材料颜色稳定性和透明度的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 14;16(6):2336. doi: 10.3390/ma16062336.
5
Effect of brushing force on the abrasive dentin wear using slurries with different abrasivity values.用不同磨蚀值的浆料研究刷牙力对牙本质磨损的影响。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Feb;21(1):172-177. doi: 10.1111/idh.12620. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
6
Association between Dental Caries and Handgrip Strength: In a Population-Based Study in Korea (KNHANES 2016-2018).口腔龋齿与握力的关系:来自韩国的一项基于人群的研究(2016-2018 年 KNHANES)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;19(16):9874. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169874.
7
Plaque removal by a novel prototype power toothbrush versus a manual toothbrush: A randomized, exploratory clinical study.新型电动牙刷与手动牙刷去除牙菌斑的效果比较:一项随机、探索性临床研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Aug;8(4):849-857. doi: 10.1002/cre2.556. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
8
Toothbrushing Performance and Oral Cleanliness after Brushing in 12-Year-Old Children.12 岁儿童刷牙后牙齿清洁效果和口腔清洁度。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2022 Jan;7(1):71-79. doi: 10.1177/2380084420975333. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
9
Effectiveness of Manual Toothbrushing Techniques on Plaque and Gingivitis: A Systematic Review.手动刷牙技术对牙菌斑和牙龈炎的有效性:一项系统评价。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Oct 2;18(4):843-854. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a45354.
10
Safety and Design Aspects of Powered Toothbrush-A Narrative Review.电动牙刷的安全性与设计方面:一篇叙述性综述
Dent J (Basel). 2020 Feb 5;8(1):15. doi: 10.3390/dj8010015.