Calestani Melania, Tonkin-Crine Sarah, Pruthi Rishi, Leydon Geraldine, Ravanan Rommel, Bradley J Andrew, Tomson Charles R, Forsythe John L, Oniscu Gabriel C, Bradley Clare, Cairns John, Dudley Christopher, Watson Christopher, Draper Heather, Johnson Rachel J, Metcalfe Wendy, Fogarty Damian G, Roderick Paul
Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
UK Renal Registry, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Nov;29(11):2144-50. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu188. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
There is variation in time to listing and rates of listing for transplantation between renal units in the UK. While research has mainly focused on healthcare organization, little is known about patient perspectives of entry onto the transplant waiting list. This qualitative study aimed to explore patients' views and experiences of kidney transplant listing.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients aged under 75, who were on dialysis and on the transplant waiting list, not on the waiting list, undergoing assessment for listing or who had received a transplant. Patients were recruited from a purposive sample of nine UK renal units, which included transplanting and non-transplanting units and units with high and low wait-listing patterns. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.
Fifty-three patients (5-7 per renal unit) were interviewed. Patients reported that they had received little information about the listing process. Some patients did not know if they were listed or had found they were not listed when they had thought they were on the list. Others expressed distress when they felt they had been excluded from potential listing based on age and/or comorbidity and felt the process was unfair. Many patients were not aware of pre-emptive transplantation and believed they had to be on dialysis before being able to be listed. There was some indication that pre-emptive transplantation was discussed more often in transplant than non-transplant units. Lastly, some patients were reluctant to consider family members as potential donors as they reported they would feel 'guilty' if the donor suffered subsequent negative effects.
Findings suggest a need to review current practice to further understand individual and organizational reasons for the renal unit variation identified in patient understanding of transplant listing. The communication of information warrants attention to ensure patients are fully informed about the listing process and opportunity for pre-emptive transplantation in a way that is meaningful and understandable to them.
英国各肾脏单位在移植登记时间和登记率方面存在差异。虽然研究主要集中在医疗保健组织方面,但对于患者进入移植等候名单的看法却知之甚少。这项定性研究旨在探讨患者对肾脏移植登记的看法和经历。
对年龄在75岁以下、正在接受透析且在移植等候名单上、不在等候名单上、正在接受登记评估或已接受移植的患者进行了半结构式访谈。患者是从英国九个肾脏单位的目的性样本中招募的,其中包括进行移植和不进行移植的单位以及等候名单模式高和低的单位。访谈逐字记录,并使用主题分析法进行分析。
共访谈了53名患者(每个肾脏单位5 - 7名)。患者报告称,他们收到的关于登记过程的信息很少。一些患者不知道自己是否已登记,或者发现自己以为已登记时却未登记。另一些患者在觉得自己因年龄和/或合并症而被排除在潜在登记之外时表示苦恼,并认为这个过程不公平。许多患者不知道有抢先移植这一情况,并且认为必须先进行透析才能登记。有迹象表明,移植单位比非移植单位更常讨论抢先移植。最后,一些患者不愿考虑家庭成员作为潜在捐赠者,因为他们表示,如果捐赠者随后出现负面影响,他们会感到“内疚”。
研究结果表明有必要审查当前的做法,以进一步了解在患者对移植登记的理解中所发现的肾脏单位差异的个人和组织原因。信息沟通值得关注,以确保患者充分了解登记过程以及抢先移植的机会,且方式要对他们有意义且易于理解。