Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins, University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):263-274. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2090460. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
The allocation of scarce deceased donor kidneys is a complex process. Transplant providers are increasingly relying on constructs such as frailty and cognitive function to guide kidney transplant (KT) candidate selection. Patient views of the ethical issues surrounding the use of such constructs are unclear. We sought to assess KT candidates' attitudes and beliefs about the use of frailty and cognitive function to guide waitlist selection.
KT candidates were randomly recruited from an ongoing single-center cohort study of frailty and cognitive function. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and thematic analysis was performed. Inductively derived themes were mapped onto bioethics principles.
Twenty interviews were conducted (65% contact rate, 100% participation rate) (60% male; 70% White). With respect to the use of frailty and cognitive function in waitlisting decisions, four themes emerged in which participants: (1) valued maximizing a scarce resource (utility); (2) prioritized equal access to all patients (equity); (3) appreciated a proportional approach to the use of equity and utility (precautionary utility); and (4) sought to weigh utility- and equity-based concerns regarding social support. While some participants believed frailty and cognitive function were useful constructs to maximize utility, others believed their use would jeopardize equity. Patients were uncomfortable with using single factors such as frailty or cognitive impairment to deny someone access to transplantation; participants instead encouraged using the constructs to identify opportunities for intervention to improve frailty and cognitive function prior to KT.
KT candidates' values mirrored the current allocation strategy, seeking to balance equity and utility in a just manner, albeit with conflicting viewpoints on the appropriate use of frailty and cognitive impairment in waitlisting decisions.
稀缺的已故供体肾脏分配是一个复杂的过程。移植提供者越来越依赖脆弱性和认知功能等构建来指导肾移植 (KT) 候选者的选择。患者对使用这些构建指导选择的伦理问题的看法尚不清楚。我们旨在评估 KT 候选者对使用脆弱性和认知功能来指导候补名单选择的态度和信念。
从一项关于脆弱性和认知功能的正在进行的单中心队列研究中随机招募 KT 候选者。进行半结构化访谈,并进行主题分析。从归纳法中得出的主题被映射到生物伦理原则上。
进行了 20 次访谈(65%的联系率,100%的参与率)(60%为男性;70%为白人)。在等待名单决策中使用脆弱性和认知功能方面,参与者出现了四个主题:(1)重视最大化稀缺资源的价值(效用);(2)优先考虑所有患者平等获得机会(公平);(3)欣赏公平和效用的比例方法(预防性效用);(4)寻求权衡与社会支持有关的效用和公平问题。虽然一些参与者认为脆弱性和认知功能是最大化效用的有用构建,但其他人认为它们的使用会危及公平。患者对使用脆弱性或认知障碍等单一因素来拒绝某人接受移植感到不安;参与者鼓励使用这些构建来确定在 KT 之前改善脆弱性和认知功能的干预机会。
KT 候选者的价值观反映了当前的分配策略,试图以公正的方式平衡公平和效用,尽管在等待名单决策中使用脆弱性和认知障碍的适当性方面存在冲突观点。