Marra Fawziah, Kaczorowski Janusz, Gastonguay Louise, Marra Carlo A, Lynd Larry D, Kendall Perry
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (F. Marra, C. Marra, Lynd, Gastonguay), University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2014 Jan;147(1):33-44. doi: 10.1177/1715163513514020.
Influenza is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Canada, with up to 7000 influenza-related deaths occurring every year. The elderly and individuals with chronic diseases are at increased risk for influenza-related morbidity and mortality.
We conducted a 2-year, community cluster-randomized trial targeting elderly people and at-risk groups to assess the effectiveness of pharmacy-based influenza vaccination clinics on influenza vaccination rates. Small rural communities in interior and northern British Columbia were randomly allocated to the intervention or control. In the intervention communities, pharmacy-based influenza vaccination clinics were held and were promoted to eligible patients using personalized invitations from the pharmacists, invitations distributed opportunistically by a pharmacist to eligible patients presenting to pharmacies during the flu season and community-wide promotion using posters and the local media. The main outcome measure was a difference in the mean influenza vaccination rates. The immunization rates were calculated using the number of immunizations given in each community divided by the population size estimated from the census data.
Baseline influenza immunization rates in the population ≥65 years of age were the same in the control (n = 10, mean 85.6% [SD 16.6]) and intervention (n = 14, mean 83.8% [SD 16.3]) communities in 2009 (p = 0.79). In 2010, the mean influenza immunization rate was 56.9% (SD 28.0) in the control communities (n = 15) and 80.1% (SD 18.4) in the intervention communities (n = 14) (p = 0.01) for those ≥65 years of age. However, in 2010, for those 2 to 64 years with chronic medical conditions, the immunization rates were lower in the intervention communities (mean 16.3% [SD 7.1]) compared with the control communities (mean 21.2% [SD 5.8]) (p = 0.04).
Clinics were feasible and well attended and they resulted in increased vaccination rates for elderly residents. In contrast, vaccination rates in the younger population with comorbidities remained low and unchanged.
在加拿大,流感是发病和死亡的主要原因之一,每年有多达7000例与流感相关的死亡病例。老年人和患有慢性病的个体患流感相关疾病和死亡的风险增加。
我们针对老年人和高危人群开展了一项为期2年的社区整群随机试验,以评估基于药房的流感疫苗接种诊所对流感疫苗接种率的有效性。不列颠哥伦比亚省内陆和北部的小型农村社区被随机分配到干预组或对照组。在干预社区,举办了基于药房的流感疫苗接种诊所,并通过药剂师的个性化邀请、药剂师在流感季节向到药房就诊的符合条件患者机会性分发邀请以及使用海报和当地媒体进行社区范围的宣传等方式,向符合条件的患者推广。主要结局指标是平均流感疫苗接种率的差异。免疫接种率通过每个社区接种的疫苗数量除以根据人口普查数据估算的人口规模来计算。
2009年,对照组(n = 10,平均85.6% [标准差16.6])和干预组(n = 14,平均83.8% [标准差16.3])中65岁及以上人群的基线流感免疫接种率相同(p = 0.79)。2010年,65岁及以上人群中,对照组(n = 15)的平均流感免疫接种率为56.9%(标准差28.0),干预组(n = 14)为80.1%(标准差18.4)(p = 0.01)。然而,2010年,对于患有慢性疾病的2至64岁人群,干预社区的免疫接种率(平均16.3% [标准差7.1])低于对照组社区(平均21.2% [标准差5.8])(p = 0.04)。
诊所是可行的且就诊率高,它们提高了老年居民的疫苗接种率。相比之下,患有合并症的年轻人群的疫苗接种率仍然很低且没有变化。