Song Chang Myeon, Ji Yong Bae, Bang Hyang Sook, Park Chul Won, Kim Dong Sun, Tae Kyung
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;21(13):4188-94. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3879-z. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
Robotic thyroidectomies have been safely performed with early surgical outcomes comparable to conventional cervical thyroidectomies. However, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after robotic thyroidectomy has not yet been evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare HRQOL of patients who underwent robotic thyroidectomy with that of those who received conventional thyroidectomy.
We conducted a cross-sectional study in 111 patients who underwent either robotic thyroidectomy (44 patients) via a gasless unilateral axillary approach, or conventional cervical thyroidectomy (67 patients), for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). HRQOL of patients was assessed using two questionnaires, the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer, and the Quality of Life-Thyroid Version (QOL-TV), which was specifically designed for thyroid cancer patients. The survey using the questionnaires was performed 1 year after surgery at a routine outpatient clinic follow-up.
There was no difference in UW-QOL scores between the two groups for any factor other than neck appearance and physical composite score, which were higher in the robotic group. Humor (mood) and anxiety, emotional measures of UW-QOL, were selected by patients in both groups as being their most significant issue during the preceding 7 days. There was no between-group difference in the four QOL-TV domains (physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well-being).
Patients who underwent robotic thyroidectomy reported a higher score for satisfaction with neck appearance compared to patients receiving conventional cervical thyroidectomy. However, the overall HRQOL of patients in the robotic and conventional groups was similar.
机器人甲状腺切除术已安全实施,其早期手术结果与传统颈部甲状腺切除术相当。然而,机器人甲状腺切除术后的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)尚未得到评估。本研究的目的是比较接受机器人甲状腺切除术的患者与接受传统甲状腺切除术的患者的HRQOL。
我们对111例因乳头状甲状腺癌(PTC)接受机器人甲状腺切除术(44例患者,采用无气单侧腋窝入路)或传统颈部甲状腺切除术(67例患者)的患者进行了一项横断面研究。使用两份问卷评估患者的HRQOL,一份是针对头颈癌患者的华盛顿大学生活质量(UW-QOL)问卷,另一份是专门为甲状腺癌患者设计的生活质量-甲状腺版(QOL-TV)。问卷调查在术后1年的常规门诊随访时进行。
除颈部外观和身体综合评分外,两组在UW-QOL评分的任何因素上均无差异,机器人组的这两项评分更高。两组患者均将UW-QOL的情绪指标幽默(情绪)和焦虑选为前7天最重要的问题。在QOL-TV的四个领域(身体、心理、社会和精神健康)中,两组之间没有差异。
与接受传统颈部甲状腺切除术的患者相比,接受机器人甲状腺切除术的患者对颈部外观的满意度评分更高。然而,机器人组和传统组患者的总体HRQOL相似。