Tartof K D, Bishop C, Jones M, Hobbs C A, Locke J
Institute for Cancer Research, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111.
Dev Genet. 1989;10(3):162-76. doi: 10.1002/dvg.1020100306.
Most variegating position effects are a consequence of placing a euchromatic gene adjacent to alpha-heterochromatin. In such rearrangements, the affected locus is inactivated in some cells, but not others, thereby giving rise to a mosaic tissue of mutant and wild-type cells. A detailed examination of the molecular structure of three variegating white mottled mutations of Drosophila melanogaster, all of which are inversions of the X chromosome, reveals that their euchromatic breakpoints are clustered and located approximately 25 kb downstream of the white promoter and that the heterochromatic sequences to which the white locus is adjoined are transposons. An analysis of three revertants of the wm4 mutation, created by relocating white to another euchromatic site, demonstrates that they also carry some heterochromatically derived sequences with them upon restoration of the wild-type phenotype. This suggests that variegation is not controlled from a heterochromatic sequence immediately adjacent to the variegating gene but rather from some site more internal to the heterochromatic domain itself. As a consequence of this observation we have proposed a boundary model for understanding how heterochromatic domains may be formed. It has been recognized for many years that the phenotype of variegating position effects may be altered by the presence of trans-acting dominant mutations that act to either enhance or suppress variegation. Using P-element mutagenesis, we have induced and examined 12 dominant enhancers of variegation that represent four loci on the second and third chromosomes. Most of these mutations are cytologically visible duplications or deficiencies. They exert their dominant effects through changes in the copy number of wild-type genes and can be divided into two reciprocally acting classes. Class I modifiers are genes that act as enhancers of variegation when duplicated and as suppressors when mutated or deficient. Conversely, class II modifiers are genes that enhance when mutated or deleted and suppress when duplicated. The available data indicate that, in Drosophila, there are 20-30 loci capable of dominantly modifying variegation. Of these, most appear to be of the class I type whereas only two class II modifiers have been identified so far.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
大多数斑驳位置效应是由于将一个常染色质基因置于α-异染色质附近所致。在这种重排中,受影响的基因座在一些细胞中失活,但在其他细胞中不失活,从而产生由突变细胞和野生型细胞组成的镶嵌组织。对果蝇三个斑驳白色突变的分子结构进行详细检查,这三个突变均为X染色体倒位,结果显示它们的常染色质断点聚集在一起,位于白色基因启动子下游约25 kb处,且与白色基因座相连的异染色质序列是转座子。对通过将白色基因重新定位到另一个常染色质位点而产生的wm4突变的三个回复体进行分析表明,在恢复野生型表型时,它们也携带一些来自异染色质的序列。这表明斑驳现象不是由紧邻斑驳基因的异染色质序列控制,而是由异染色质结构域内部的某个位点控制。基于这一观察结果,我们提出了一个边界模型来解释异染色质结构域可能是如何形成的。多年来人们已经认识到,斑驳位置效应的表型可能会因反式作用显性突变的存在而改变,这些突变可增强或抑制斑驳现象。利用P因子诱变,我们诱导并检测了12个斑驳显性增强子,它们代表第二和第三条染色体上的四个基因座。这些突变大多在细胞学上表现为可见的重复或缺失。它们通过野生型基因拷贝数的变化发挥显性作用,可分为两个相互作用的类别。I类修饰基因在重复时作为斑驳增强子起作用,在突变或缺失时作为抑制子起作用。相反,II类修饰基因在突变或缺失时增强斑驳现象,在重复时抑制。现有数据表明,在果蝇中,有20 - 30个基因座能够显性修饰斑驳现象。其中,大多数似乎属于I类,而到目前为止仅鉴定出两个II类修饰基因。(摘要截取自400字)