• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

边际优势比估计量的比较。

A comparison of marginal odds ratio estimators.

作者信息

Loux Travis M, Drake Christiana, Smith-Gagen Julie

机构信息

1 Department of Biostatistics, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, USA.

2 Department of Statistics, University of California - Davis, Davis, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Feb;26(1):155-175. doi: 10.1177/0962280214541995. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1177/0962280214541995
PMID:25006032
Abstract

Uses of the propensity score to obtain estimates of causal effect have been investigated thoroughly under assumptions of linearity and additivity of exposure effect. When the outcome variable is binary relationships such as collapsibility, valid for the linear model, do not always hold. This article examines uses of the propensity score when both exposure and outcome are binary variables and the parameter of interest is the marginal odds ratio. We review stratification and matching by the propensity score when calculating the Mantel-Haenszel estimator and show that it is consistent for neither the marginal nor conditional odds ratio. We also investigate a marginal odds ratio estimator based on doubly robust estimators and summarize its performance relative to other recently proposed estimators under various conditions, including low exposure prevalence and model misspecification. Finally, we apply all estimators to a case study estimating the effect of Medicare plan type on the quality of care received by African-American breast cancer patients.

摘要

在暴露效应的线性和可加性假设下,倾向得分用于获得因果效应估计值的情况已得到充分研究。当结果变量为二元变量时,对于线性模型有效的诸如可折叠性等关系并不总是成立。本文研究当暴露和结果均为二元变量且感兴趣的参数为边际优势比时倾向得分的用途。我们回顾在计算Mantel-Haenszel估计量时按倾向得分进行分层和匹配的情况,并表明它对于边际或条件优势比均不一致。我们还研究了基于双重稳健估计量的边际优势比估计量,并总结了其在各种条件下(包括低暴露患病率和模型错误设定)相对于其他最近提出的估计量的性能。最后,我们将所有估计量应用于一个案例研究,以估计医疗保险计划类型对非裔美国乳腺癌患者所接受护理质量的影响。

相似文献

1
A comparison of marginal odds ratio estimators.边际优势比估计量的比较。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Feb;26(1):155-175. doi: 10.1177/0962280214541995. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
2
Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.使用逻辑回归和倾向评分分层法估计边缘比值比的估计值和置信区间。
Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):760-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.3811.
3
Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.利用结合倾向评分分层和加权的双重稳健估计器改进因果推断。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):697-702. doi: 10.1111/jep.12714. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
4
Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.因果推断中的模型误设定与稳健性:比较匹配法和双重稳健估计。
Stat Med. 2012 Jul 10;31(15):1572-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.4496. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
5
Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.模型误设定和平均因果效应逆概率加权估计的偏差。
Biom J. 2023 Feb;65(2):e2100118. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100118. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
6
Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.纵向治疗效果的双重稳健有效估计量:模拟中的比较性能及一个案例研究
Int J Biostat. 2019 Feb 26;15(2):/j/ijb.2019.15.issue-2/ijb-2017-0054/ijb-2017-0054.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2017-0054.
7
Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.平均因果效应的分层双稳健估计量。
Biometrics. 2014 Jun;70(2):270-7. doi: 10.1111/biom.12157. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
8
Propensity score weighting with multilevel data.倾向评分加权与多层次数据。
Stat Med. 2013 Aug 30;32(19):3373-87. doi: 10.1002/sim.5786. Epub 2013 Mar 24.
9
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios.用于估计边际优势比的不同倾向评分方法的性能。
Stat Med. 2007 Jul 20;26(16):3078-94. doi: 10.1002/sim.2781.
10
Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment.用于高维混杂因素调整的双稳健匹配估计量。
Biometrics. 2018 Dec;74(4):1171-1179. doi: 10.1111/biom.12887. Epub 2018 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A controlled effects approach to assessing immune correlates of protection.采用对照效应方法评估保护相关免疫指标。
Biostatistics. 2023 Oct 18;24(4):850-865. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxac024.
2
Spiegelman and Zhou Respond.施皮格尔曼和周做出回应。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Mar;109(3):e13-e14. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304917.
3
Invited Commentary: Beware the Test-Negative Design.特邀评论:警惕阴性对照设计。
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 Sep 1;184(5):354-6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww063.
4
How Does Managed Care Improve the Quality of Breast Cancer Care Among Medicare-Insured Minority Women?管理式医疗如何提高医疗保险参保少数族裔女性乳腺癌护理质量?
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016 Sep;3(3):496-507. doi: 10.1007/s40615-015-0167-y. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
5
Propensity Score-Based Approaches to Confounding by Indication in Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis: Non-Standardized Treatment for Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis.个体患者数据荟萃分析中基于倾向评分的指征性混杂处理方法:耐多药结核病的非标准化治疗
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 29;11(3):e0151724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151724. eCollection 2016.