• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按健康保险状况划分的急诊科非紧急使用趋势。

Trends in nonemergent use of emergency departments by health insurance status.

作者信息

Gandhi Sabina Ohri, Grant Lauren P, Sabik Lindsay M

机构信息

RTI International, Washington, DC, USA

Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Oct;71(5):496-521. doi: 10.1177/1077558714541481. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

DOI:10.1177/1077558714541481
PMID:25006044
Abstract

This article describes trends in nonemergent emergency department (ED) visits by insurance type, using the 2000-2009 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and Current Population Survey. We analyzed trends in the probability that an ED visit is nonemergent and in nonemergent ED visit rates per person. We found that visits for Medicare enrollees were least likely to be for nonemergent reasons, while uninsured visits were most likely to be nonemergent. When we accounted for total visits and population size by insurance group, we found nonemergent ED visit rates per person were largest among Medicaid enrollees. Trends in nonemergent ED visit rates were stable for all insurance groups. The findings suggest a reliance on the ED for nonemergent care by the Medicaid population. It will be important to continue to track patterns of nonemergent ED utilization after Medicaid expansions under the Affordable Care Act.

摘要

本文利用2000 - 2009年全国医院门诊医疗调查和当前人口调查,按保险类型描述了非急诊急诊科就诊趋势。我们分析了急诊就诊为非急诊的概率趋势以及每人的非急诊急诊科就诊率趋势。我们发现,医疗保险参保者的就诊最不可能是非急诊原因,而未参保者的就诊最有可能是非急诊。当我们考虑各保险组的就诊总数和人口规模时,发现医疗补助计划参保者的每人非急诊急诊科就诊率最高。所有保险组的非急诊急诊科就诊率趋势都很稳定。研究结果表明,医疗补助计划人群在非急诊医疗方面依赖急诊科。在《平价医疗法案》下医疗补助计划扩大后,继续跟踪非急诊急诊科利用模式将很重要。

相似文献

1
Trends in nonemergent use of emergency departments by health insurance status.按健康保险状况划分的急诊科非紧急使用趋势。
Med Care Res Rev. 2014 Oct;71(5):496-521. doi: 10.1177/1077558714541481. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
2
Changes in insurance status and emergency department visits after the 2008 economic downturn.2008年经济衰退后保险状况及急诊科就诊情况的变化。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):73-80. doi: 10.1111/acem.12553. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
3
Health insurance status change and emergency department use among US adults.美国成年人的健康保险状况变化与急诊科就诊情况
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 23;172(8):642-7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.34. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
4
Magnitude of national ED visits and resource utilization by the uninsured.无保险人群的国家急诊就诊人次和资源利用情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;31(4):722-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
5
When coverage expands: children's health insurance program as a natural experiment in use of health care services.覆盖范围扩大时:儿童健康保险计划作为医疗服务利用的自然实验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;20(10):1026-32. doi: 10.1111/acem.12236.
6
The Effect of Medicaid Expansion on Utilization in Maryland Emergency Departments.医疗补助扩大对马里兰州急诊科医疗服务利用情况的影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;70(5):607-614.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
7
Emergency Department Use across 88 Small Areas after Affordable Care Act Implementation in Illinois.伊利诺伊州实施《平价医疗法案》后88个小区域的急诊科使用情况
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;18(5):811-820. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.5.34007. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
8
The effect of expanded insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act on emergency department utilization in New York.平价医疗法案扩大保险范围对纽约急诊部门利用的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:183-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.076. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
9
Insurance impact on nonurgent and primary care-sensitive emergency department use.保险对非紧急和初级保健敏感的急诊科使用情况的影响。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Mar;21(3):210-7.
10
National profile of nonemergent pediatric emergency department visits.国家非紧急儿科急诊就诊情况概述。
Pediatrics. 2010 Mar;125(3):454-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0544. Epub 2010 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of patient socioeconomic status with outcomes after palliative treatment for disseminated cancer.患者社会经济状况与癌症广泛转移后姑息治疗结局的关联。
Cancer Med. 2024 May;13(9):e7028. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7028.
2
Examining delays in diagnosis for slipped capital femoral epiphysis from a health disparities perspective.从健康差异的角度探讨股骨颈滑离的诊断延误。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0269745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269745. eCollection 2022.
3
Utilization of public health care by people with private health insurance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
私人医疗保险人群对公共卫生保健的利用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 23;20(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08861-9.
4
Socioeconomic bias in influenza surveillance.流感监测中的社会经济偏见。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Jul 9;16(7):e1007941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007941. eCollection 2020 Jul.
5
Identifying diverse concepts of discharge failure patients at emergency department in the USA: a large-scale retrospective observational study.识别美国急诊科出院失败患者的不同概念:一项大规模回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 27;9(6):e028051. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028051.
6
Socioeconomic disparities in the complexity of hernias evaluated at Emergency Departments across the United States.美国各地急诊部评估的疝病复杂性的社会经济差异。
Am J Surg. 2019 Sep;218(3):551-559. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.042. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
7
Mental Health and Drivers of Need in Emergent and Non-Emergent Emergency Department (ED) Use: Do Living Location and Non-Emergent Care Sources Matter?精神健康与紧急和非紧急急诊就诊的需求驱动因素:居住地点和非紧急医疗资源是否重要?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 13;15(1):129. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010129.
8
A "Patch" to the NYU Emergency Department Visit Algorithm.纽约大学急诊科就诊算法的一个“补丁”。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1264-1276. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12638.
9
Public Health, Hypertension, and the Emergency Department.公共卫生、高血压与急诊科
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2016 Jun;18(6):50. doi: 10.1007/s11906-016-0654-5.
10
A Systematic Review of Emergency Department Use Among Cancer Patients.癌症患者急诊科使用情况的系统评价
Cancer Nurs. 2017 Mar/Apr;40(2):135-144. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000360.