Won Jong-Uk, Kim Inah
Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Yonsei University Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Jun;29 Suppl(Suppl):S12-7. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.S.S12. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
The purpose of this study was to discuss the history of, and concerns regarding, the newly amended criteria of occupational cerebrovascular or cardiovascular diseases (CCVDs). Since the early 1990s, CCVDs have been the second most common occupational disease, despite fluctuations in their criteria. The first issue was the deletion of cerebral hemorrhage on duty as a recognized occupational disease in 2008. The second issue was the obscurity regarding definitions of an acute stressful event (within 24 hr before disease occurrence), short-term overwork (within 1 week), and chronic overwork (for 3 or more months). In this amendment, chronic overwork was defined as work exceeding 60 hr per week. If the average number of weekly working hours does not exceed 60 hr, night work, physical or psychological workload, or other risk factors should be considered for the recognition of occupational CCVDs. However, these newly amended criteria still have a few limitations, considering that there is research evidence for the occurrence of disease in those working fewer than 60 hr per week, and other risk factors, particularly night work, are underestimated in these criteria. Thus, we suggest that these concerns be actively considered during future amendment and approval processes.
本研究的目的是探讨新修订的职业性脑血管或心血管疾病(CCVDs)标准的历史及相关问题。自20世纪90年代初以来,尽管CCVDs的标准有所波动,但它一直是第二常见的职业病。第一个问题是2008年将当班脑出血从公认的职业病中删除。第二个问题是急性应激事件(发病前24小时内)、短期过度劳累(1周内)和慢性过度劳累(3个月或更长时间)的定义不明确。在此次修订中,慢性过度劳累被定义为每周工作超过60小时。如果每周平均工作小时数不超过60小时,则在认定职业性CCVDs时应考虑夜班、身体或心理工作量或其他风险因素。然而,考虑到有研究证据表明每周工作少于60小时的人也会发病,且这些标准对其他风险因素,尤其是夜班的评估不足,这些新修订的标准仍有一些局限性。因此,我们建议在未来的修订和审批过程中积极考虑这些问题。