LAR Laboratory - Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università di Perugia, Italy.
LAR Laboratory - Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università di Perugia, Italy.
Waste Manag. 2014 Nov;34(11):2382-92. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
Life cycle analysis of several waste management scenarios for an Italian urban area was performed on the basis of different source segregation collection (SS) intensities from 0% up to 52%. Source segregated waste was recycled and or/recovered by composting. Residual waste management options were by landfilling, incineration with energy recovery or solid recovered fuel (SRF) production to substitute for coal. The increase in fuel and materials consumption due to increase in SS had negligible influence on the environmental impact of the system. Recycling operations such as incineration and SRF were always advantageous for impact reduction. There was lower impact for an SS of 52% even though the difference with the SS intensity of 35% was quite limited, about 15%. In all the configurations analyzed, the best environmental performance was achieved for the management system producing SRF by the biodrying process.
对意大利某城区基于不同源头分类收集(SS)强度(从 0%到 52%)的几种废物管理方案进行了生命周期分析。源头分类收集的废物通过回收和/或堆肥进行再循环和/或回收。剩余废物管理选项为垃圾填埋、焚烧以回收能源或生产固体回收燃料(SRF)以替代煤炭。由于 SS 的增加而导致的燃料和材料消耗的增加对系统的环境影响几乎没有影响。如焚烧和 SRF 等回收作业总是有利于减少影响。尽管与 35%的 SS 强度相比,52%的 SS 的差异相当有限,约为 15%,但仍具有较低的影响。在分析的所有配置中,通过生物干化工艺生产 SRF 的管理系统实现了最佳的环境绩效。