Faculty of Water Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 Feb 6;191(3):131. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7273-y.
This study assessed the available status of waste management system in Ahvaz and its impact on the environment, as well as seven other scenarios in order to quantitatively calculate potential environmental impacts by utilizing the life cycle assessment (LCA) method. These scenarios were as follows: scenario 1: landfilling without biogas collection; scenario 2: landfilling with biogas collection; scenario 3: composting and landfilling without biogas collection; scenario 4: recycling and composting; scenario 5: composting and incineration; scenario 6: anaerobic digestion, recycling, and landfilling; scenario 7: anaerobic digestion and incineration. Emissions were calculated by the integrated waste management (IWM) model and classified into five impact categories: resource consumption, global warming, acidification potential, photochemical oxidation, and eco-toxicity. In terms of resource consumption and the depletion of non-renewable resources, the third scenario showed the worst performance due to its lack of any recycling, energy recovery, and conversion to energy. In terms of greenhouse gas emissions and the effect on global warming, scenario 1 and scenario 2 showed that disposing the whole amount of waste resulted in the most amount of greenhouse gases produced. Moreover, 50% gas and energy recovery from landfills, in comparison with the non-recovery method, reduced the index of global warming by 12%. Finally, scenarios which were based on producing energy from waste showed a reasonably positive performance in terms of greenhouse gases emissions and the influence on global warming.
本研究评估了阿瓦兹现有的废物管理系统及其对环境的影响,并针对其他七种情况进行了评估,以便利用生命周期评估(LCA)方法定量计算潜在的环境影响。这些方案如下:方案 1:不收集沼气的垃圾填埋;方案 2:收集沼气的垃圾填埋;方案 3:不收集沼气的堆肥和垃圾填埋;方案 4:回收和堆肥;方案 5:堆肥和焚烧;方案 6:厌氧消化、回收和垃圾填埋;方案 7:厌氧消化和焚烧。通过综合废物管理(IWM)模型计算排放,并将其分为五类影响类别:资源消耗、全球变暖、酸化潜力、光化学氧化和生态毒性。就资源消耗和不可再生资源的枯竭而言,由于缺乏任何回收、能源回收和能源转化,第三种方案表现最差。就温室气体排放和对全球变暖的影响而言,方案 1 和方案 2 表明,处理全部废物会产生最多的温室气体。此外,与不回收方法相比,从垃圾填埋场回收 50%的气体和能源可将全球变暖指数降低 12%。最后,基于废物产生能源的方案在温室气体排放和对全球变暖的影响方面表现出相当积极的性能。