Chrostek Lech, Panasiuk Anatol
Lech Chrostek, Department of Biochemical Diagnostics, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-540 Bialystok, Poland.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 7;20(25):8018-23. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8018.
Alcohol is one of the main factors of liver damage. The evaluation of the degree of liver fibrosis is of great value for therapeutic decision making in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD). Staging of liver fibrosis is essential to define prognosis and management of the disease. Liver biopsy is a gold standard as it has high sensitivity and specificity in fibrosis diagnostics. Taking into account the limitations of liver biopsy, there is an exigency to introduce non-invasive serum markers for fibrosis that would be able to replace liver biopsy. Ideal serum markers should be specific for the liver, easy to perform and independent to inflammation and fibrosis in other organs. Serum markers of hepatic fibrosis are divided into direct and indirect. Indirect markers reflect alterations in hepatic function, direct markers reflect extracellular matrix turnover. These markers should correlate with dynamic changes in fibrogenesis and fibrosis resolution. The assessment of the degree of liver fibrosis in alcoholic liver disease has diagnostic and prognostic implications, therefore noninvasive assessment of fibrosis remains important. There are only a few studies evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic values of noninvasive biomarkers of fibrosis in patients with ALD. Several noninvasive laboratory tests have been used to assess liver fibrosis in patients with alcoholic liver disease, including the hyaluronic acid, FibroTest, FibrometerA, Hepascore, Forns and APRI indexes, FIB4, an algorithm combining Prothrombin index (PI), α-2 macroglobulin and hyaluronic acid. Among these tests, Fibrotest, FibrometerA and Hepascore demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy in identifying advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, and additionally, Fibrotest was independently associated with survival. Therefore, the use of biomarkers may reduce the need for liver biopsy and permit an earlier treatment of alcoholic patients.
酒精是肝损伤的主要因素之一。肝纤维化程度的评估对于酒精性肝病(ALD)患者的治疗决策具有重要价值。肝纤维化分期对于确定疾病的预后和管理至关重要。肝活检是金标准,因为它在纤维化诊断中具有高敏感性和特异性。考虑到肝活检的局限性,迫切需要引入能够替代肝活检的非侵入性纤维化血清标志物。理想的血清标志物应具有肝脏特异性,易于检测,且与其他器官的炎症和纤维化无关。肝纤维化的血清标志物分为直接标志物和间接标志物。间接标志物反映肝功能的改变,直接标志物反映细胞外基质的周转。这些标志物应与纤维化形成和纤维化消退的动态变化相关。酒精性肝病中肝纤维化程度的评估具有诊断和预后意义,因此纤维化的非侵入性评估仍然很重要。仅有少数研究评估了ALD患者中纤维化非侵入性生物标志物的诊断和预后价值。几种非侵入性实验室检查已用于评估酒精性肝病患者的肝纤维化,包括透明质酸、FibroTest、FibrometerA、Hepascore、Forns和APRI指数、FIB4,一种结合凝血酶原指数(PI)、α-2巨球蛋白和透明质酸的算法。在这些检查中,Fibrotest、FibrometerA和Hepascore在识别晚期纤维化和肝硬化方面表现出优异的诊断准确性,此外,Fibrotest与生存率独立相关。因此,使用生物标志物可能会减少肝活检的需求,并使酒精性肝病患者能够更早接受治疗。