• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亲子对话中的字母知识:社会经济地位不同的家庭之间的差异。

Letter knowledge in parent-child conversations: differences between families differing in socio-economic status.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, University of Kansas Lawrence, KS, USA.

Department of Philosophy, Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 24;5:632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00632. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00632
PMID:25009516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4067604/
Abstract

When formal literacy instruction begins, around the age of 5 or 6, children from families low in socioeconomic status (SES) tend to be less prepared than children from families of higher SES. The goal of our study is to explore one route through which SES may influence children's early literacy skills: informal conversations about letters. The study builds on previous studies (Robins and Treiman, 2009; Robins et al., 2012, 2014) of parent-child conversations that show how U. S. parents and their young children talk about writing and provide preliminary evidence about similarities and differences in parent-child conversations as a function of SES. Focusing on parents and children aged three to five, we conducted five separate analyses of these conversations, asking whether and how family SES influences the previously established patterns. Although we found talk about letters in both upper and lower SES families, there were differences in the nature of these conversations. The proportion of letter talk utterances that were questions was lower in lower SES families and, of all the letter names that lower SES families talked about, more of them were uttered in isolation rather than in sequences. Lower SES families were especially likely to associate letters with the child's name, and they placed more emphasis on sequences in alphabetic order. We found no SES differences in the factors that influenced use of particular letter names (monograms), but there were SES differences in two-letter sequences (digrams). Focusing on the alphabet and on associations between the child's name and the letters within it may help to interest the child in literacy activities, but they many not be very informative about the relationship between letters and words in general. Understanding the patterns in parent-child conversations about letters is an important first step for exploring their contribution to children's early literacy skills and school readiness.

摘要

当正式的读写能力教学开始时,大约在 5 或 6 岁左右,来自社会经济地位(SES)较低家庭的孩子往往不如来自 SES 较高家庭的孩子准备充分。我们的研究目的是探索 SES 可能影响儿童早期读写技能的途径之一:关于字母的非正式对话。这项研究建立在之前的研究(罗宾斯和崔曼,2009;罗宾斯等人,2012 年,2014 年)的基础上,这些研究表明了美国父母和他们的年幼孩子如何谈论写作,并提供了关于 SES 作为父母-孩子对话功能的相似性和差异性的初步证据。我们专注于 3 至 5 岁的父母和孩子,对这些对话进行了五次独立分析,询问 SES 是否以及如何影响之前建立的模式。尽管我们在 SES 较高和较低的家庭中都发现了关于字母的对话,但这些对话的性质存在差异。SES 较低的家庭中,问题式的字母对话比例较低,而且在 SES 较低的家庭中提到的字母名称中,更多的是孤立地而不是连续地出现。SES 较低的家庭尤其可能将字母与孩子的名字联系起来,并且他们更强调字母顺序。我们没有发现 SES 在影响特定字母名称(字母组合)使用的因素方面存在差异,但在两个字母序列(双字母组合)方面存在差异。关注字母和孩子名字与字母之间的关联可能有助于孩子对读写活动产生兴趣,但它们可能无法很好地反映字母与一般单词之间的关系。了解父母与孩子之间关于字母的对话模式是探索其对儿童早期读写技能和学校准备的贡献的重要第一步。

相似文献

1
Letter knowledge in parent-child conversations: differences between families differing in socio-economic status.亲子对话中的字母知识:社会经济地位不同的家庭之间的差异。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 24;5:632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00632. eCollection 2014.
2
Parent-Child Conversations About Letters and Pictures.关于字母和图片的亲子对话。
Read Writ. 2012 Sep;25(8):2039-2059. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9344-5.
3
Letter Knowledge in Parent-Child Conversations.亲子对话中的字母认知
Read Writ. 2014 Mar 1;27(3):407-429. doi: 10.1007/s11145-013-9450-7.
4
Parent-child conversations about literacy: a longitudinal, observational study.亲子间关于读写能力的对话:一项纵向观察研究。
J Child Lang. 2018 Mar;45(2):511-525. doi: 10.1017/S0305000917000307. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
5
Parents' Talk About Letters With Their Young Children.父母与年幼子女谈论字母。
Child Dev. 2015 Sep-Oct;86(5):1406-18. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12385. Epub 2015 May 25.
6
Letter Teaching in Parent-Child Conversations.亲子对话中的言传身教。
Early Child Res Q. 2020;53:161-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 May 5.
7
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
8
Contributions of naturalistic parent-child conversations to children's science learning during informal learning at an aquarium and at home.自然主义的亲子对话对儿童在水族馆和家中非正式学习期间科学学习的贡献。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 8;13:943648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943648. eCollection 2022.
9
Learning to write letters: examination of student and letter factors.学习书写字母:学生因素与字母因素的考察
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Dec;128:152-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
10
Home Learning Environments of Children in Mexico in Relation to Socioeconomic Status.墨西哥儿童的家庭学习环境与社会经济地位的关系
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 19;12:626159. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626159. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex differences in the temporal dynamics of autistic children's natural conversations.自闭症儿童自然会话的时间动态中的性别差异。
Mol Autism. 2023 Apr 6;14(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13229-023-00545-6.
2
ERP Mismatch Negativity Amplitude and Asymmetry Reflect Phonological and Rapid Automatized Naming Skills in English-Speaking Kindergartners.事件相关电位失配负波的波幅和不对称性反映了英语母语幼儿园儿童的语音和快速自动命名技能。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jun 18;15:624617. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.624617. eCollection 2021.
3
Letter Teaching in Parent-Child Conversations.亲子对话中的言传身教。
Early Child Res Q. 2020;53:161-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 May 5.
4
Phonological memory problems are magnified in children from language minority homes when predicting reading disability.在预测阅读障碍时,来自语言少数群体家庭的儿童的语音记忆问题会被放大。
J Child Lang. 2020 May;47(3):680-694. doi: 10.1017/S0305000919000576. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
5
Editorial: Frontiers in the acquisition of literacy.社论:读写能力培养的前沿领域
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 17;6:1019. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01019. eCollection 2015.
6
Parents' Talk About Letters With Their Young Children.父母与年幼子女谈论字母。
Child Dev. 2015 Sep-Oct;86(5):1406-18. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12385. Epub 2015 May 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Variations in the Home Literacy Environment of Preschool Children: A Cluster Analytic Approach.学龄前儿童家庭读写环境的差异:一种聚类分析方法。
Sci Stud Read. 2009;13(2):146-174. doi: 10.1080/10888430902769533.
2
Letter Knowledge in Parent-Child Conversations.亲子对话中的字母认知
Read Writ. 2014 Mar 1;27(3):407-429. doi: 10.1007/s11145-013-9450-7.
3
Parent-Child Conversations About Letters and Pictures.关于字母和图片的亲子对话。
Read Writ. 2012 Sep;25(8):2039-2059. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9344-5.
4
What counts in the development of young children's number knowledge?儿童数知识发展的关键因素是什么?
Dev Psychol. 2010 Sep;46(5):1309-19. doi: 10.1037/a0019671.
5
Talking About Writing: What We Can Learn from Conversations between Parents and Their Young Children.谈写作:我们能从父母与幼儿的对话中学到什么。
Appl Psycholinguist. 2009;30(3):463-484. doi: 10.1017/S0142716409090237.
6
The proper name as starting point for basic reading skills.以专有名称作为基础阅读技能的起点。
Read Writ. 2010 Feb;23(2):173-187. doi: 10.1007/s11145-008-9158-2. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
7
Influence of verbal and nonverbal references to print on preschoolers' visual attention to print during storybook reading.在绘本阅读过程中,言语和非言语对印刷品的提及对学龄前儿童视觉关注印刷品的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2008 May;44(3):855-66. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.855.
8
Increasing print awareness in preschoolers with language impairment using non-evocative print referencing.使用非启发性印刷参考提高语言障碍学龄前儿童的印刷意识。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2007 Jan;38(1):16-30. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2007/003).
9
The role of home literacy practices in preschool children's language and emergent literacy skills.家庭读写实践在学龄前儿童语言和早期读写技能发展中的作用。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Apr;48(2):345-59. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/024).
10
The early education of socioeconomically disadvantaged children.社会经济条件不利儿童的早期教育。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:517-45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.111301.145442. Epub 2002 Jun 10.