相似文献
1
Editorial: Frontiers in the acquisition of literacy.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 17;6:1019. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01019. eCollection 2015.
2
Lexical-Level Predictors of Reading Comprehension in Third Grade: Is Spelling a Unique Contributor?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Nov 19;28(4):1597-1610. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0299. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
3
Reading comprehension, word decoding and spelling in girls with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD): performance and predictors.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010 Jan-Feb;45(1):61-71. doi: 10.3109/13682820902745438.
4
Investigation of basic cognitive predictors of reading and spelling abilities in Tunisian third-grade primary school children.
Brain Dev. 2015 Jun;37(6):579-91. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
5
Does testing with feedback improve adult spelling skills relative to copying and reading?
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015 Dec;21(4):356-69. doi: 10.1037/xap0000062. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
6
Comparing the spelling and reading abilities of students with cochlear implants and students with typical hearing.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015 Apr;20(2):125-35. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env002. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
7
The Role of Phonological versus Morphological Skills in the Development of Arabic Spelling: An Intervention Study.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Jun;45(3):507-35. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9362-6.
8
Native Korean-Speaking Children Learning to Read in English: A Structural Analysis of L2-English Literacy Acquisition.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Apr;48(2):391-415. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9610-7.
9
The development of word recognition, sentence comprehension, word spelling, and vocabulary in children with deafness: a longitudinal study.
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 May;34(5):1781-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
10
The effects of a multilinguistic morphological awareness approach for improving language and literacy.
J Learn Disabil. 2014 Jan-Feb;47(1):76-85. doi: 10.1177/0022219413509972.
本文引用的文献
1
What are the criteria for a good intervention study? Response: "Unrecognized ambiguities in validity of intervention research: an example on explicit phonics and text-centered teaching".
Front Psychol. 2015 May 5;6:508. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00508. eCollection 2015.
2
Unrecognized ambiguities in validity of intervention research: an example on explicit phonics and text-centered teaching.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 7;5:1535. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01535. eCollection 2014.
3
The effect of phonics-enhanced Big Book reading on the language and literacy skills of 6-year-old pupils of different reading ability attending lower SES schools.
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 13;5:1222. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01222. eCollection 2014.
4
Inflectional and derivational morphological spelling abilities of children with Specific Language Impairment.
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 27;5:948. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00948. eCollection 2014.
5
Alphabetism and the science of reading: from the perspective of the akshara languages.
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 12;5:866. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00866. eCollection 2014.
6
Alphabetism in reading science.
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 18;5:752. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00752. eCollection 2014.
7
Developmental differences in masked form priming are not driven by vocabulary growth.
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 11;5:667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00667. eCollection 2014.
8
Learning to read as the formation of a dynamic system: evidence for dynamic stability in phonological recoding.
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 3;5:660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00660. eCollection 2014.
9
Letter knowledge in parent-child conversations: differences between families differing in socio-economic status.
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 24;5:632. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00632. eCollection 2014.
10
Discovering and accounting for limitations in applications of theories of word reading acquisition.
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 13;5:579. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00579. eCollection 2014.
Zotero 插件