Schorl Martin, Valerius-Kukula Seung-Ja, Kemmer Thomas P
SRH Fachkrankenhaus Neresheim, Kösinger Street 11, D-73450 Neresheim, Germany; Asklepios Schlossberg-Klinik, Frankfurter Street 33, D-64732 Bad König, Germany.
SRH Fachkrankenhaus Neresheim, Kösinger Street 11, D-73450 Neresheim, Germany.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;123:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 14.
In patients with severe brain injury (SBI) median-evoked somatosensory potentials (M-SSEP) serve as a prognostic tool. Bilateral loss of cortical responses (BLCR) is usually thought to be a reliable marker of poor prognosis. Prognostic accuracy to predict a poor outcome depends on the cause of coma and is best in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) reaching almost 100% which is in contrast to patients with other etiologies of coma, especially traumatic brain injury (TBI). Only little evidence exists on the possibility of electrophysiological recovery of BLCR in repeated or serial SSEP-examinations and detailed functional outcome in these cases.
28 patients (78.6% male, 21.4% female, mean age 43.1±18.6 years) from our in-patient early (post-acute) neurorehabilitation center with BLCR in their first M-SSEP were re-examined after a mean interval of 66±55.8 days. SBI was caused by different etiologies. We retrospectively analyzed (a) the recovery rate from BLCR in consecutive M-SSEP and (b) the detailed functional outcome of those patients with recovered cortical responses.
14/28 (50%) patients with primarily BLCR showed re-occurrence of cortical potentials, either uni- or bilaterally. Of the 14 patients, one died due to a non-neurological cause. Of the remaining 13 patients 6 - most of them suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) - could be transferred to further continuing neurorehabilitation and achieved good functional long-term outcome. BLCR in HIE still had a poor prognosis with none of our patients achieving an outcome better than vegetative state.
Electrophysiological recovery from primarily BLCR seems possible and is accompanied by good functional outcome in a relevant number of patients. Thus caution is warranted in predicting a poor prognosis based predominantly on SSEP, especially in patients with TBI. Focusing SSEP-examination on the early days after severe brain injury and performing only one examination in the case of BLCR may lead to systematic underestimation of the possibility of recovery.
在重度脑损伤(SBI)患者中,正中神经体感诱发电位(M-SSEP)可作为一种预后评估工具。双侧皮质反应丧失(BLCR)通常被认为是预后不良的可靠标志。预测不良预后的准确性取决于昏迷的病因,在缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)中最佳,几乎可达100%,这与其他昏迷病因的患者,尤其是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者形成对比。关于在重复或系列SSEP检查中BLCR电生理恢复的可能性以及这些病例的详细功能结局,仅有少量证据。
对我们住院早期(急性后期)神经康复中心的28例患者(男性占78.6%,女性占21.4%,平均年龄43.1±18.6岁)进行研究,这些患者首次M-SSEP检查时存在BLCR,平均间隔66±55.8天后进行复查。SBI由不同病因引起。我们回顾性分析了(a)连续M-SSEP检查中BLCR的恢复率,以及(b)皮质反应恢复患者的详细功能结局。
14/28(50%)最初存在BLCR的患者出现了皮质电位的再次出现,单侧或双侧。在这14例患者中,1例因非神经系统原因死亡。其余13例患者中,6例(其中大多数患有创伤性脑损伤(TBI))能够转入进一步的持续神经康复治疗,并取得了良好的长期功能结局。HIE患者的BLCR预后仍然很差,我们的患者中没有一例结局优于植物状态。
最初的BLCR电生理恢复似乎是可能的,并且在相当数量的患者中伴有良好的功能结局。因此,在主要基于SSEP预测不良预后时应谨慎,尤其是在TBI患者中。将SSEP检查集中在重度脑损伤后的早期,并且在出现BLCR的情况下仅进行一次检查可能会导致对恢复可能性的系统性低估。