• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在发展中国家,既往有下段剖宫产史后经阴道分娩是否安全?

Is vaginal delivery safe after previous lower segment caesarean section in developing country?

作者信息

Gupta Pratiksha, Jahan Ishrat, Jograjiya Gelabhai R

机构信息

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Post Graduate Institute Of Medical Sciences and Research Employees State Insurance, Basaidarapur, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Niger Med J. 2014 May;55(3):260-5. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.132067.

DOI:10.4103/0300-1652.132067
PMID:25013261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4089058/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To analyse the mode of delivery in trial of labour (TOL), incidence of successful vaginal deliveries and indications of repeat caesarean section (CS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective selective study. Study population consisted of 367 pregnant women with previous one lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) in reproductive age group. These were grouped in to three groups, Group 1 (n = 239): Women, who were elected for repeat CS without a TOL. Group 2 (n = 76): Women, who were given TOL and delivered vaginally. Group 3 (n = 52): Women, who were given a TOL but due to failed trial, had to be taken for emergency repeat section. The maternal and foetal outcome was studied in all the groups.

STATISTICAL METHOD USED

The data was entered in the Microsoft excel worksheet, values expressed as mean ± SD. Chi-square test was done to compare the categorical variables among the groups. ANOVA (one-way analysis of variance) was done to compare the baseline characteristics of patients and time to delivery among the groups.

RESULTS

Out of 128 women who were given TOL, 76 (59.37%) vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) occurred, out of which 40 (52.63%) had spontaneous vaginal deliveries without augmentation of labour and 36 (47.36%) subjects had augmentation of labour with artificial rupture of membranes (ARMs) and oxytocin. A total of 52 women (40.62%) underwent emergency LSCS.

CONCLUSION

Proper selection and counselling about clinically significant risks, women can be given TOL with careful monitoring and taken for emergency LSCS on minimal indication is the best answer to management of previous one CS in labour.

摘要

背景

分析试产(TOL)中的分娩方式、剖宫产术后阴道分娩成功的发生率及再次剖宫产的指征。

材料与方法

前瞻性选择性研究。研究对象为367名育龄期曾行一次子宫下段剖宫产(LSCS)的孕妇。这些孕妇被分为三组,第一组(n = 239):未进行试产而直接选择再次剖宫产的女性。第二组(n = 76):接受试产并经阴道分娩的女性。第三组(n = 52):接受试产但因试产失败而不得不接受急诊再次剖宫产的女性。对所有组的母婴结局进行研究。

所用统计方法

数据录入Microsoft Excel工作表,数值以均数±标准差表示。采用卡方检验比较各组间的分类变量。采用方差分析(单向方差分析)比较患者的基线特征及各组间的分娩时间。

结果

在128名接受试产的女性中,有76例(59.37%)成功进行了剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC),其中40例(52.63%)为未使用催产素的自然阴道分娩,36例(47.36%)为使用人工破膜(ARMs)及催产素催产的阴道分娩。共有52名女性(40.62%)接受了急诊子宫下段剖宫产。

结论

对有临床显著风险的患者进行恰当选择和咨询,在密切监测下对女性进行试产,并在最低指征下进行急诊子宫下段剖宫产,是处理前次剖宫产产妇分娩问题的最佳方法。

相似文献

1
Is vaginal delivery safe after previous lower segment caesarean section in developing country?在发展中国家,既往有下段剖宫产史后经阴道分娩是否安全?
Niger Med J. 2014 May;55(3):260-5. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.132067.
2
Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth.既往剖宫产术后阴道分娩指南。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Feb;27(2):164-88. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30188-8.
3
Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth.既往剖宫产术后阴道分娩指南。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004 Jul;26(7):660-83; quiz 684-6.
4
VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER A PREVIOUS CAESAREAN SECTION: CURRENT TRENDS AND OUTLOOK IN GHANA.既往剖宫产术后经阴道分娩:加纳的当前趋势与展望
J West Afr Coll Surg. 2014 Apr-Jun;4(2):1-25.
5
Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.臀位的阴道分娩
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Jun;31(6):557-566. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34221-9.
6
Pattern of cervical dilatation in previous lower segment caesarean section patients.既往下段剖宫产患者的宫颈扩张模式。
J Indian Med Assoc. 1997 May;95(5):131-4.
7
SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005.加拿大妇产科医师协会临床实践指南。既往剖宫产术后阴道分娩指南。第155号(取代第147号指南),2005年2月
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Jun;89(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.03.015.
8
Antenatal scoring system in predicting the success of planned vaginal birth following one previous caesarean section.预测既往有一次剖宫产史后计划阴道分娩成功率的产前评分系统。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Apr;38(3):339-343. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1355896. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
9
Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands.荷兰有剖宫产史女性的产科管理及妊娠结局
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Jun;132(2):171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.07.017. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
10
Factors affecting vaginal birth after caesarean section at Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.影响新西兰奥克兰米德尔莫尔医院剖宫产术后阴道分娩的因素。
N Z Med J. 2013 Sep 27;126(1383):49-57.

引用本文的文献

1
Vaginal birth after cesarean section and its associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术后阴道分娩及其相关因素的研究进展:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 15;13(1):7882. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34856-8.
2
Exposure to oil pollution and maternal outcomes: The Niger Delta prospective cohort study.接触油污与孕产妇结局:尼日尔三角洲前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 2;17(3):e0263495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263495. eCollection 2022.
3
Safety and feasibility of trial of labor in pregnant women with cesarean scar diverticulum.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology of cesarean delivery: the scope of the problem.剖宫产的流行病学:问题的范围。
Semin Perinatol. 2012 Oct;36(5):308-14. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2012.04.012.
2
Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth.有剖宫产史的女性行择期再次剖宫产与引产的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16(5):CD004906. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004906.pub3.
3
Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean section vs elective repeat cesarean delivery: a systematic review with metaanalysis.
剖宫产憩室孕妇试产的安全性和可行性。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Sep;48(9):300060520954993. doi: 10.1177/0300060520954993.
4
Fertility rates and perinatal outcomes of adolescent pregnancies: a retrospective population-based study.青少年怀孕的生育率和围产期结局:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017 Apr 6;25:e2876. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.1820.2876.
剖宫产术后试产与择期再次剖宫产术后的孕产妇发病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;199(3):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.025. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
4
Risks of induction of labour in women with a uterine scar from previous low transverse caesarean section.既往行低位横切口剖宫产术后子宫有瘢痕的女性引产的风险。
BJOG. 2004 Dec;111(12):1394-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00287.x.
5
Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.既往剖宫产术后试产相关的母儿结局
N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 16;351(25):2581-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040405. Epub 2004 Dec 14.
6
Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies.既往剖宫产术后足月单胎妊娠分娩相关的围产期死亡风险
JAMA. 2002;287(20):2684-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2684.
7
Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999.选择性重复剖宫产与试产:1989年至1999年文献的荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Nov;183(5):1187-97. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.108890.
8
Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section.试产与选择性二次剖宫产的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 5;335(10):689-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199609053351001.
9
Cesarean section delivery in the 1980s: international comparison by indication.20世纪80年代的剖宫产分娩:按指征进行的国际比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;170(2):495-504. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70217-9.