• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

没有 ψ-认知模型可以完全解释量子态的不可区分性。

No ψ-epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QD, United Kingdom.

Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QD, United Kingdom and School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2016, Australia.

出版信息

Phys Rev Lett. 2014 Jun 27;112(25):250403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.250403. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.250403
PMID:25014796
Abstract

According to a recent no-go theorem [M. Pusey, J. Barrett and T. Rudolph, Nat. Phys. 8, 475 (2012)], models in which quantum states correspond to probability distributions over the values of some underlying physical variables must have the following feature: the distributions corresponding to distinct quantum states do not overlap. In such a model, it cannot coherently be maintained that the quantum state merely encodes information about underlying physical variables. The theorem, however, considers only models in which the physical variables corresponding to independently prepared systems are independent, and this has been used to challenge the conclusions of that work. Here we consider models that are defined for a single quantum system of dimension d, such that the independence condition does not arise, and derive an upper bound on the extent to which the probability distributions can overlap. In particular, models in which the quantum overlap between pure states is equal to the classical overlap between the corresponding probability distributions cannot reproduce the quantum predictions in any dimension d ≥ 3. Thus any ontological model for quantum theory must postulate some extra principle, such as a limitation on the measurability of physical variables, to explain the indistinguishability of quantum states. Moreover, we show that as d→∞, the ratio of classical and quantum overlaps goes to zero for a class of states. The result is noise tolerant, and an experiment is motivated to distinguish the class of models ruled out from quantum theory.

摘要

根据最近的一个不可行定理[M. Pusey、J. Barrett 和 T. Rudolph,Nat. Phys. 8, 475 (2012)],量子态对应于某些潜在物理变量值的概率分布的模型必须具有以下特征:对应于不同量子态的分布不重叠。在这样的模型中,不能一致地认为量子态仅仅编码了关于潜在物理变量的信息。然而,该定理仅考虑了对应于独立制备系统的物理变量相互独立的模型,并且这已被用于挑战该工作的结论。在这里,我们考虑了为单个量子系统定义的模型,其维度为 d,使得独立性条件不会出现,并推导出概率分布可以重叠的程度的上限。特别是,对于量子纯态之间的量子重叠等于相应概率分布之间的经典重叠的模型,在任何维度 d≥3 中都不能再现量子预测。因此,量子理论的任何本体论模型都必须假定一些额外的原则,例如对物理变量的可测量性的限制,以解释量子态的不可区分性。此外,我们表明,对于一类状态,随着 d→∞,经典和量子重叠的比值趋于零。该结果具有抗噪声性,并激发了一项实验来区分从量子理论中排除的模型类。

相似文献

1
No ψ-epistemic model can fully explain the indistinguishability of quantum states.没有 ψ-认知模型可以完全解释量子态的不可区分性。
Phys Rev Lett. 2014 Jun 27;112(25):250403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.250403. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
2
How ψ-epistemic models fail at explaining the indistinguishability of quantum states.ψ-认知模型如何在解释量子态的不可区分性方面失败。
Phys Rev Lett. 2014 Jul 11;113(2):020409. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.020409. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
3
ψ-Epistemic models are exponentially bad at explaining the distinguishability of quantum states.ψ-认知模型在解释量子态的可区分性方面表现得非常糟糕。
Phys Rev Lett. 2014 Apr 25;112(16):160404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.160404.
4
No-go theorems for ψ-epistemic models based on a continuity assumption.基于连续性假设的 ψ-认知模型的不可行定理。
Phys Rev Lett. 2013 Aug 30;111(9):090402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.090402. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
5
No-go theorem for the composition of quantum systems.量子系统合成的不可行定理。
Phys Rev Lett. 2014 Feb 21;112(7):070407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.070407.
6
Implications of the Pusey-Barrett-Rudolph quantum no-go theorem.普西-巴雷特-鲁道夫量子不可行定理的意义。
Phys Rev Lett. 2012 Jun 29;108(26):260404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.260404. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
7
Experimental test of the no-go theorem for continuous ψ-epistemic models.连续ψ-认知模型的不可行定理的实验测试。
Sci Rep. 2016 May 31;6:26519. doi: 10.1038/srep26519.
8
On the Classification Between -Ontic and -Epistemic Ontological Models.关于 - 本体论与 - 认知本体论模型之间的分类
Found Phys. 2020;50(11):1315-1345. doi: 10.1007/s10701-020-00377-x. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
9
Distinct quantum states can be compatible with a single state of reality.不同的量子态可以与单一的现实状态兼容。
Phys Rev Lett. 2012 Oct 12;109(15):150404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.150404. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
10
Quantum mechanics as classical statistical mechanics with an ontic extension and an epistemic restriction.量子力学是一种经典统计力学,具有本体论扩展和认识论限制。
Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 3;8(1):1306. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01375-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating the 16-dimensional Hilbert space of a high-spin donor qudit with electric and magnetic fields.利用电场和磁场在高自旋供体量子位的16维希尔伯特空间中导航。
Nat Commun. 2024 Feb 14;15(1):1380. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45368-y.
2
The wave function as a true ensemble.作为真实系综的波函数。
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2022 Jun;478(2262):20210705. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2021.0705. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?是否有可能在没有逆因果关系的情况下对量子理论进行时间对称解释?
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2017 Jun;473(2202):20160607. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2016.0607. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
4
Experimental test of the no-go theorem for continuous ψ-epistemic models.连续ψ-认知模型的不可行定理的实验测试。
Sci Rep. 2016 May 31;6:26519. doi: 10.1038/srep26519.
5
Bell's inequality violation with spins in silicon.硅中自旋的贝尔不等式违背。
Nat Nanotechnol. 2016 Mar;11(3):242-6. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.262. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
6
Quantum physics: What is really real?量子物理学:什么是真实存在的?
Nature. 2015 May 21;521(7552):278-80. doi: 10.1038/521278a.