Vigilance and Risk Management of Medicines, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London SW1W 9SZ, UK
Vigilance and Risk Management of Medicines, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, London SW1W 9SZ, UK.
BMJ. 2014 Jul 11;349:g4219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4219.
To examine the safety of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy.
Observational cohort study.
The UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.
20,074 pregnant women with a median age of 30 who received the pertussis vaccine and a matched historical unvaccinated control group.
Adverse events identified from clinical diagnoses during pregnancy, with additional data from the matched child record identified through mother-child linkage. The primary event of interest was stillbirth (intrauterine death after 24 weeks' gestation).
There was no evidence of an increased risk of stillbirth in the 14 days immediately after vaccination (incidence rate ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 1.62) or later in pregnancy (0.85, 0.44 to 1.61) compared with historical national rates. Compared with a matched historical cohort of unvaccinated pregnant women, there was no evidence that vaccination accelerated the time to delivery (hazard ratio 1.00, 0.97 to 1.02). Furthermore, there was no evidence of an increased risk of stillbirth, maternal or neonatal death, pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, haemorrhage, fetal distress, uterine rupture, placenta or vasa praevia, caesarean delivery, low birth weight, or neonatal renal failure, all serious events that can occur naturally in pregnancy.
In women given pertussis vaccination in the third trimester, there is no evidence of an increased risk of any of an extensive predefined list of adverse events related to pregnancy. In particular, there was no evidence of an increased risk of stillbirth. Given the recent increases in the rate of pertussis infection and morbidity and mortality in neonates, these early data provide initial evidence for evaluating the safety of the vaccine in pregnancy for health professionals and the public and can help to inform vaccination policy making.
研究妊娠期间百日咳疫苗接种的安全性。
观察性队列研究。
英国临床实践研究数据链接。
20074 名中位年龄为 30 岁的孕妇,她们接受了百日咳疫苗接种,并有一个匹配的未接种历史对照组。
从妊娠期间的临床诊断中确定的不良事件,并通过母婴链接从匹配的儿童记录中获得额外数据。主要关注的事件是死胎(妊娠 24 周后宫内死亡)。
与历史全国率相比,在接种后 14 天内(发生率比 0.69,95%置信区间 0.23 至 1.62)或妊娠后期(0.85,0.44 至 1.61),没有证据表明死胎的风险增加。与匹配的未接种孕妇历史队列相比,没有证据表明疫苗接种加速了分娩时间(风险比 1.00,0.97 至 1.02)。此外,没有证据表明死胎、母亲或新生儿死亡、子痫前期或子痫、出血、胎儿窘迫、子宫破裂、胎盘或帆状前置胎盘、剖宫产、低出生体重或新生儿肾衰竭的风险增加,所有这些都是妊娠期间可能自然发生的严重事件。
在妊娠晚期接受百日咳疫苗接种的妇女中,没有证据表明与妊娠相关的广泛预先定义的不良事件列表中的任何一个事件的风险增加。特别是,没有证据表明死胎风险增加。鉴于最近百日咳感染率以及新生儿发病率和死亡率的增加,这些早期数据为评估妊娠期间疫苗接种的安全性提供了初步证据,可供卫生专业人员和公众参考,并有助于制定疫苗接种政策。