• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于诊断试验准确性研究的Meta分析的潜在类别双变量模型。

Latent class bivariate model for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

作者信息

Eusebi Paolo, Reitsma Johannes B, Vermunt Jeroen K

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Regional Health Authority of Umbria, Via Mario Angeloni, 61, 06124 Perugia, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jul 11;14:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-88.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-14-88
PMID:25015209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4105799/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several types of statistical methods are currently available for the meta-analysis of studies on diagnostic test accuracy. One of these methods is the Bivariate Model which involves a simultaneous analysis of the sensitivity and specificity from a set of studies. In this paper, we review the characteristics of the Bivariate Model and demonstrate how it can be extended with a discrete latent variable. The resulting clustering of studies yields additional insight into the accuracy of the test of interest.

METHODS

A Latent Class Bivariate Model is proposed. This model captures the between-study variability in sensitivity and specificity by assuming that studies belong to one of a small number of latent classes. This yields both an easier to interpret and a more precise description of the heterogeneity between studies. Latent classes may not only differ with respect to the average sensitivity and specificity, but also with respect to the correlation between sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

The Latent Class Bivariate Model identifies clusters of studies with their own estimates of sensitivity and specificity. Our simulation study demonstrated excellent parameter recovery and good performance of the model selection statistics typically used in latent class analysis. Application in a real data example on coronary artery disease showed that the inclusion of latent classes yields interesting additional information.

CONCLUSIONS

Our proposed new meta-analysis method can lead to a better fit of the data set of interest, less biased estimates and more reliable confidence intervals for sensitivities and specificities. But even more important, it may serve as an exploratory tool for subsequent sub-group meta-analyses.

摘要

背景

目前有几种统计方法可用于诊断试验准确性研究的荟萃分析。其中一种方法是双变量模型,它涉及对一组研究的敏感性和特异性进行同时分析。在本文中,我们回顾了双变量模型的特点,并展示了如何用离散潜在变量对其进行扩展。由此产生的研究聚类为感兴趣的试验准确性提供了更多见解。

方法

提出了一种潜在类别双变量模型。该模型通过假设研究属于少数几个潜在类别之一来捕捉研究间敏感性和特异性的变异性。这不仅产生了更易于解释的研究间异质性描述,而且更精确。潜在类别不仅在平均敏感性和特异性方面可能不同,而且在敏感性和特异性之间的相关性方面也可能不同。

结果

潜在类别双变量模型识别出具有自身敏感性和特异性估计值的研究聚类。我们的模拟研究表明,参数恢复良好,潜在类别分析中常用的模型选择统计量表现良好。在冠心病真实数据实例中的应用表明,纳入潜在类别可产生有趣的额外信息。

结论

我们提出的新荟萃分析方法可以使感兴趣的数据集拟合得更好,敏感性和特异性的估计偏差更小,置信区间更可靠。但更重要的是,它可以作为后续亚组荟萃分析的探索工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da32/4105799/8d70984402ff/1471-2288-14-88-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da32/4105799/32e0211be112/1471-2288-14-88-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da32/4105799/eda64b4848dc/1471-2288-14-88-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da32/4105799/f15769e36b92/1471-2288-14-88-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da32/4105799/241916fcaa01/1471-2288-14-88-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da32/4105799/8d70984402ff/1471-2288-14-88-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da32/4105799/32e0211be112/1471-2288-14-88-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da32/4105799/eda64b4848dc/1471-2288-14-88-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da32/4105799/f15769e36b92/1471-2288-14-88-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da32/4105799/241916fcaa01/1471-2288-14-88-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da32/4105799/8d70984402ff/1471-2288-14-88-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Latent class bivariate model for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.用于诊断试验准确性研究的Meta分析的潜在类别双变量模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Jul 11;14:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-88.
2
Mixture models in diagnostic meta-analyses--clustering summary receiver operating characteristic curves accounted for heterogeneity and correlation.诊断性荟萃分析中的混合模型——聚类汇总受试者工作特征曲线可解释异质性和相关性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jan;68(1):61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
3
Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.研究表明,在没有金标准的诊断研究中,检测潜在类别模型不匹配存在问题。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;74:158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
4
Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study.利用考虑到测试之间条件依赖性的潜在类别模型估计诊断测试的灵敏度和特异性:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Mar 10;23(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01873-0.
5
Skew-normal random-effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies.用于荟萃诊断测试准确性 (DTA) 研究的斜正态随机效应模型。
Biom J. 2020 Sep;62(5):1223-1244. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201900184. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
6
Statistics for quantifying heterogeneity in univariate and bivariate meta-analyses of binary data: the case of meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy.二元数据单变量和双变量荟萃分析中异质性量化的统计学方法:诊断准确性荟萃分析的案例
Stat Med. 2014 Jul 20;33(16):2701-17. doi: 10.1002/sim.6115. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
7
Latent class models in diagnostic studies when there is no reference standard--a systematic review.无参考标准诊断研究中潜类别模型的系统评价。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Feb 15;179(4):423-31. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt286. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
8
Robust bivariate random-effects model for accommodating outlying and influential studies in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.稳健双变量随机效应模型在诊断性试验准确性研究荟萃分析中处理离群值和有影响力的研究。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Nov;29(11):3308-3325. doi: 10.1177/0962280220925840. Epub 2020 May 29.
9
Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.考虑疾病患病率的诊断准确性研究的Meta分析:替代参数化和模型选择。
Stat Med. 2009 Aug 15;28(18):2384-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.3627.
10
Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis models for diagnostic test accuracy studies using arcsine-based transformations.使用基于反正弦变换的诊断试验准确性研究的双变量随机效应荟萃分析模型。
Biom J. 2018 Jul;60(4):827-844. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700101. Epub 2018 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Biomarkers for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.临床生物标志物术前预测子宫内膜癌淋巴结转移的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oncologist. 2019 Sep;24(9):e880-e890. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0117. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
2
A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.一种用于诊断准确性研究的双变量随机效应荟萃分析的双SIMEX方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Jan 11;17(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0284-2.
3
The Moses-Littenberg meta-analytical method generates systematic differences in test accuracy compared to hierarchical meta-analytical models.

本文引用的文献

1
Latent class models in diagnostic studies when there is no reference standard--a systematic review.无参考标准诊断研究中潜类别模型的系统评价。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Feb 15;179(4):423-31. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt286. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
2
Diagnostic accuracy measures.诊断准确性测量。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;36(4):267-72. doi: 10.1159/000353863. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
3
Variation of a test's sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence.随着疾病流行率的变化,检测的灵敏度和特异性会发生变化。
与分层荟萃分析模型相比,摩西-利滕伯格荟萃分析方法在检验准确性方面产生了系统性差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;80:77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
4
Accuracy of point-of-care testing for circulatory cathodic antigen in the detection of schistosome infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.即时检测循环阴极抗原在血吸虫感染检测中的准确性:系统评价与荟萃分析
Bull World Health Organ. 2016 Jul 1;94(7):522-533A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.15.158741. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
CMAJ. 2013 Aug 6;185(11):E537-44. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121286. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
4
Meta-analysis of diagnostic test data: a bivariate Bayesian modeling approach.诊断测试数据的荟萃分析:双变量贝叶斯建模方法。
Stat Med. 2010 Dec 30;29(30):3088-102. doi: 10.1002/sim.4055.
5
Summary ROC curve based on a weighted Youden index for selecting an optimal cutpoint in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.基于加权约登指数的汇总受试者工作特征曲线在诊断准确性荟萃分析中选择最佳截断点的研究
Stat Med. 2010 Dec 30;29(30):3069-78. doi: 10.1002/sim.3937.
6
Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.荟萃分析:计算机断层扫描与磁共振成像用于非侵入性冠状动脉造影。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Feb 2;152(3):167-77. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-3-201002020-00008.
7
Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using integrated nested Laplace approximations.贝叶斯二元诊断试验研究的综合嵌套拉普拉斯逼近的荟萃分析。
Stat Med. 2010 May 30;29(12):1325-39. doi: 10.1002/sim.3858.
8
Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic studies using generalized linear mixed models.二变量随机效应 meta 分析在广义线性混合模型在诊断研究中的应用。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(4):499-508. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09353452. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
9
Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: alternative parameterizations and model selection.考虑疾病患病率的诊断准确性研究的Meta分析:替代参数化和模型选择。
Stat Med. 2009 Aug 15;28(18):2384-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.3627.
10
Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.ROC曲线的双变量随机效应荟萃分析。
Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):621-38. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08319957. Epub 2008 Jun 30.