Nozaki Tetsuo, Asao Yoshihiro, Katoh Tomonori, Yasuda Kenji, Fuse Hideki
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama 930-0194, Japan.
Urol J. 2014 Jul 8;11(3):1595-601.
We report our experience of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy without ischemia using a microwave tissue coagulator (MTC) for hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (HALPN), conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (CLPN), and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for partial nephrectomy (LESSPN). We retrospectively compared the results of these techniques to better define the individual role and the benefits.
From July 2005 to September 2012, 28 patients with small and exophytic renal tumors underwent HALPN (n = 12), CLPN (n = 10) and LESSPN (n = 6). In these procedures, the surgeon used an MTC for circumferential coagulation around the tumor. After coagulation, the tumor was resected without renal pedicle clamping.
The mean operative time was 259, 194 and 174 min for the HALPN, CLPN and LESSPN groups respectively. Two patients (one in HALPN group and one in LESSPN group) converted to laparotomy due to an inability to maintain hemostasis; however, there were no conversions to ischemic partial nephrectomy or radical nephrectomy. No differences between HALPN, CLPN and LESSPN were noted in terms of estimated blood loss, measured analgesic requirements, outcomes, or complications.
We believe that these techniques are feasible and that they minimize the risk of unexpected collateral thermal damage by appropriate MTC needle puncture. When deciding to use HALPN, CLPN or LESSPN, our findings suggest that the choice of surgical approach should depend on the patient's individual circumstance.
我们报告了使用微波组织凝固器(MTC)进行手辅助腹腔镜部分肾切除术(HALPN)、传统腹腔镜部分肾切除术(CLPN)和腹腔镜单部位部分肾切除术(LESSPN)时,不进行缺血处理的微创部分肾切除术的经验。我们回顾性比较了这些技术的结果,以更好地确定各自的作用和优势。
2005年7月至2012年9月,28例患有小的外生性肾肿瘤的患者接受了HALPN(n = 12)、CLPN(n = 10)和LESSPN(n = 6)。在这些手术中,外科医生使用MTC对肿瘤周围进行环形凝固。凝固后,在不夹闭肾蒂的情况下切除肿瘤。
HALPN、CLPN和LESSPN组的平均手术时间分别为259、194和174分钟。2例患者(HALPN组1例,LESSPN组1例)因无法维持止血而转为开腹手术;然而,没有转为缺血性部分肾切除术或根治性肾切除术的情况。在估计失血量、测量的镇痛需求、结果或并发症方面,HALPN、CLPN和LESSPN之间没有差异。
我们认为这些技术是可行的,并且通过适当的MTC针穿刺可将意外的侧支热损伤风险降至最低。在决定使用HALPN、CLPN或LESSPN时,我们的研究结果表明手术方法的选择应取决于患者的个体情况。