Schwappach David L B, Gehring Katrin
Swiss Patient Safety Foundation, Asylstr, 77, 8032 Zuerich, Switzerland.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jul 14;14:303. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-303.
Research suggests that "silence", i.e., not voicing safety concerns, is common among health care professionals (HCPs). Speaking up about patient safety is vital to avoid errors reaching the patient and thus to prevent harm and also to improve a culture of teamwork and safety. The aim of our study was to explore factors that affect oncology staff's decision to voice safety concerns or to remain silent and to describe the trade-offs they make.
In a qualitative interview study with 32 doctors and nurses from 7 oncology units we investigated motivations and barriers to speaking up towards co-workers and supervisors. An inductive thematic content analysis framework was applied to the transcripts. Based on the individual experiences of participants, we conceptualize the choice to voice concerns and the trade-offs involved.
Preventing patients from serious harm constitutes a strong motivation to speaking up but competes with anticipated negative outcomes. Decisions whether and how to voice concerns involved complex considerations and trade-offs. Many respondents reflected on whether the level of risk for a patient "justifies" the costs of speaking up. Various barriers for voicing concerns were reported, e.g., damaging relationships. Contextual factors, such as the presence of patients and co-workers in the alarming situation, affect the likelihood of anticipated negative outcomes. Speaking up to well-known co-workers was described as considerably easier whereas "not knowing the actor well" increases risks and potential costs of speaking up.
While doctors and nurses felt strong obligation to prevent errors reaching individual patients, they were not engaged in voicing concerns beyond this immediacy. Our results offer in-depth insight into fears and conditions conducive of silence and voicing and can be used for educational interventions and leader reinforcement.
研究表明,“沉默”,即不表达安全担忧,在医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)中很常见。说出患者安全问题对于避免错误影响患者、预防伤害以及改善团队合作与安全文化至关重要。我们研究的目的是探讨影响肿瘤科室工作人员表达安全担忧或保持沉默的因素,并描述他们所做的权衡。
在一项对来自7个肿瘤科室的32名医生和护士进行的定性访谈研究中,我们调查了向同事和上级表达意见的动机和障碍。对访谈记录应用归纳主题内容分析框架。基于参与者的个人经历,我们对表达担忧的选择及其涉及的权衡进行了概念化。
防止患者受到严重伤害是表达意见的强烈动机,但与预期的负面结果相竞争。是否以及如何表达担忧的决定涉及复杂的考虑和权衡。许多受访者思考患者的风险水平是否“值得”表达意见的代价。报告了表达担忧的各种障碍,例如破坏关系。情境因素,如在令人担忧的情况下患者和同事的在场情况,会影响预期负面结果的可能性。向熟悉的同事表达意见被描述为容易得多,而“不太了解对方”会增加表达意见的风险和潜在代价。
虽然医生和护士深感有责任防止错误影响个别患者,但他们并未超越这种直接性去表达担忧。我们的结果深入洞察了导致沉默和表达意见的恐惧及条件,可用于教育干预和领导强化。