Hopkins William D, Russell Jamie L, Schaeffer Jennifer
Neuroscience Institute and Language Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302, USA; Division of Developmental and Cognitive Neuroscience, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Neuroscience Institute and Language Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30302, USA; Division of Developmental and Cognitive Neuroscience, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Curr Biol. 2014 Jul 21;24(14):1649-1652. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.076. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
The role that genes play in human intelligence or IQ has remained a point of significant scientific debate dating back to the time of Galton [1]. It has now become increasingly clear that IQ is heritable in humans, but these effects can be modified by nongenetic mechanisms [2-4]. In contrast to human IQ, until recently, views of learning and cognition in animals have largely been dominated by the behaviorist school of thought, originally championed by Watson [5] and Skinner [6]. A large body of accumulated research now demonstrates a variety of cognitive abilities in nonhuman animals and challenges traditional behaviorist interpretations of performance [7, 8]. This, in turn, has led to a renewed interest in the role that social and biological factors might play in explaining individual and phylogenetic differences in cognition [9]. Specifically, aside from early attempts to selectively breed for learning skills in rodents [10-12], studies examining the role that genetic factors might play in individual variation in cognitive abilities in nonhuman animals, particularly nonhuman primates, are scarce. Here, we utilized a modified Primate Cognitive Test Battery [13] in conjunction with quantitative genetic analyses to examine whether cognitive performance is heritable in chimpanzees. We found that some but not all cognitive traits were significantly heritable in chimpanzees. We further found significant genetic correlations between different dimensions of cognitive functioning, suggesting that the genes that explain the variability of one cognitive trait might also explain that of other cognitive traits.
基因在人类智力或智商中所起的作用,自高尔顿时代起就一直是科学上激烈争论的焦点[1]。现在越来越清楚的是,智商在人类中具有遗传性,但这些影响可以通过非遗传机制加以改变[2 - 4]。与人类智商不同的是,直到最近,动物学习与认知的观点在很大程度上仍受行为主义思想流派的主导,该流派最初由华生[5]和斯金纳[6]倡导。现在大量积累的研究表明非人类动物具有多种认知能力,并对传统行为主义对行为表现的解释提出了挑战[7, 8]。这反过来又引发了人们对社会和生物因素在解释认知方面个体及系统发育差异中可能发挥的作用重新产生兴趣[9]。具体而言,除了早期在啮齿动物中为学习技能进行选择性育种的尝试[10 - 12]外,研究非人类动物,特别是非人类灵长类动物认知能力个体差异中遗传因素可能发挥的作用的研究很少。在这里,我们使用经过改进的灵长类认知测试组合[13]并结合定量遗传分析,来研究黑猩猩的认知表现是否具有遗传性。我们发现,黑猩猩的一些而非所有认知特征具有显著遗传性。我们还进一步发现认知功能不同维度之间存在显著的遗传相关性,这表明解释一种认知特征变异性的基因也可能解释其他认知特征的变异性。