Yin H Shonna, Dreyer Benard P, Ugboaja Donna C, Sanchez Dayana C, Paul Ian M, Moreira Hannah A, Rodriguez Luis, Mendelsohn Alan L
Department of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine and Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, New York;
Department of Pediatrics, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania; and.
Pediatrics. 2014 Aug;134(2):e354-61. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0395. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
Adopting the milliliter as the preferred unit of measurement has been suggested as a strategy to improve the clarity of medication instructions; teaspoon and tablespoon units may inadvertently endorse nonstandard kitchen spoon use. We examined the association between unit used and parent medication errors and whether nonstandard instruments mediate this relationship.
Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a larger study of provider communication and medication errors. English- or Spanish-speaking parents (n = 287) whose children were prescribed liquid medications in 2 emergency departments were enrolled. Medication error defined as: error in knowledge of prescribed dose, error in observed dose measurement (compared to intended or prescribed dose); >20% deviation threshold for error. Multiple logistic regression performed adjusting for parent age, language, country, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, education, health literacy (Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults); child age, chronic disease; site.
Medication errors were common: 39.4% of parents made an error in measurement of the intended dose, 41.1% made an error in the prescribed dose. Furthermore, 16.7% used a nonstandard instrument. Compared with parents who used milliliter-only, parents who used teaspoon or tablespoon units had twice the odds of making an error with the intended (42.5% vs 27.6%, P = .02; adjusted odds ratio=2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.4) and prescribed (45.1% vs 31.4%, P = .04; adjusted odds ratio=1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.5) dose; associations greater for parents with low health literacy and non-English speakers. Nonstandard instrument use partially mediated teaspoon and tablespoon-associated measurement errors.
Findings support a milliliter-only standard to reduce medication errors.
有人建议采用毫升作为首选计量单位,以此作为提高用药说明清晰度的一种策略;茶匙和汤匙单位可能会无意中鼓励使用不标准的厨房勺子。我们研究了所使用的单位与家长用药错误之间的关联,以及不标准器具是否介导了这种关系。
对一项关于医疗服务提供者沟通与用药错误的大型研究的基线数据进行横断面分析。纳入了在2个急诊科为其孩子开具液体药物处方的英语或西班牙语家长(n = 287)。用药错误定义为:规定剂量知识错误、观察到的剂量测量错误(与预期或规定剂量相比);错误偏差阈值>20%。进行多因素逻辑回归分析,对家长的年龄、语言、国家、种族/民族、社会经济地位、教育程度、健康素养(成人功能性健康素养简短测试);孩子的年龄、慢性病;就诊地点进行校正。
用药错误很常见:39.4%的家长在测量预期剂量时出错,41.1%的家长在规定剂量上出错。此外,16.7%的家长使用了不标准器具。与仅使用毫升的家长相比,使用茶匙或汤匙单位的家长在预期剂量(42.5%对27.6%,P = 0.02;校正比值比 = 2.3;95%置信区间,1.2 - 4.4)和规定剂量(45.1%对31.4%,P = 0.04;校正比值比 = 1.9;95%置信区间,1.03 - 3.5)上出错的几率是前者的两倍;对于健康素养低的家长和非英语家长,这种关联更大。不标准器具的使用部分介导了与茶匙和汤匙相关的测量错误。
研究结果支持仅采用毫升标准以减少用药错误。