• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于核贝叶斯矩阵分解的癌症综合与个性化定量构效关系分析

Integrative and personalized QSAR analysis in cancer by kernelized Bayesian matrix factorization.

作者信息

Ammad-ud-din Muhammad, Georgii Elisabeth, Gönen Mehmet, Laitinen Tuomo, Kallioniemi Olli, Wennerberg Krister, Poso Antti, Kaski Samuel

机构信息

Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Information and Computer Science, Aalto University , P.O. Box 15400, Espoo 00076, Finland.

出版信息

J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Aug 25;54(8):2347-59. doi: 10.1021/ci500152b. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1021/ci500152b
PMID:25046554
Abstract

With data from recent large-scale drug sensitivity measurement campaigns, it is now possible to build and test models predicting responses for more than one hundred anticancer drugs against several hundreds of human cancer cell lines. Traditional quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) approaches focus on small molecules in searching for their structural properties predictive of the biological activity in a single cell line or a single tissue type. We extend this line of research in two directions: (1) an integrative QSAR approach predicting the responses to new drugs for a panel of multiple known cancer cell lines simultaneously and (2) a personalized QSAR approach predicting the responses to new drugs for new cancer cell lines. To solve the modeling task, we apply a novel kernelized Bayesian matrix factorization method. For maximum applicability and predictive performance, the method optionally utilizes genomic features of cell lines and target information on drugs in addition to chemical drug descriptors. In a case study with 116 anticancer drugs and 650 cell lines, we demonstrate the usefulness of the method in several relevant prediction scenarios, differing in the amount of available information, and analyze the importance of various types of drug features for the response prediction. Furthermore, after predicting the missing values of the data set, a complete global map of drug response is explored to assess treatment potential and treatment range of therapeutically interesting anticancer drugs.

摘要

借助近期大规模药物敏感性测量活动的数据,现在能够构建并测试预测一百多种抗癌药物对数百种人类癌细胞系反应的模型。传统的定量构效关系(QSAR)方法专注于小分子,以寻找其在单一细胞系或单一组织类型中预测生物活性的结构特性。我们从两个方向扩展了这一研究方向:(1)一种综合QSAR方法,可同时预测一组多个已知癌细胞系对新药的反应;(2)一种个性化QSAR方法,可预测新癌细胞系对新药的反应。为了解决建模任务,我们应用了一种新颖的核化贝叶斯矩阵分解方法。为了实现最大的适用性和预测性能,该方法除了化学药物描述符外,还可选择利用细胞系的基因组特征和药物的靶点信息。在一项针对116种抗癌药物和650个细胞系的案例研究中,我们展示了该方法在几种相关预测场景中的有用性,这些场景在可用信息量上有所不同,并分析了各种类型的药物特征对反应预测的重要性。此外,在预测数据集的缺失值后,探索了完整的药物反应全局图,以评估具有治疗意义的抗癌药物的治疗潜力和治疗范围。

相似文献

1
Integrative and personalized QSAR analysis in cancer by kernelized Bayesian matrix factorization.基于核贝叶斯矩阵分解的癌症综合与个性化定量构效关系分析
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 Aug 25;54(8):2347-59. doi: 10.1021/ci500152b. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
2
Discovery of new selective cytotoxic agents against Bcl-2 expressing cancer cells using ligand-based modeling.基于配体的建模方法发现针对表达 Bcl-2 的癌细胞的新型选择性细胞毒性药物。
Chem Biol Interact. 2016 Apr 25;250:12-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
3
Improved anticancer drug response prediction in cell lines using matrix factorization with similarity regularization.使用具有相似性正则化的矩阵分解改进细胞系中抗癌药物反应预测。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 2;17(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3500-5.
4
QSAR classification model for antibacterial compounds and its use in virtual screening.抗菌化合物的定量构效关系分类模型及其在虚拟筛选中的应用。
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Oct 22;52(10):2559-69. doi: 10.1021/ci300336v. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
5
Profile-QSAR: a novel meta-QSAR method that combines activities across the kinase family to accurately predict affinity, selectivity, and cellular activity.谱定量构效关系(Profile-QSAR):一种新型的元定量构效关系方法,它结合了激酶家族的各项活性,可准确预测亲和力、选择性和细胞活性。
J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Aug 22;51(8):1942-56. doi: 10.1021/ci1005004. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
6
Drug response prediction by inferring pathway-response associations with kernelized Bayesian matrix factorization.通过使用核贝叶斯矩阵分解推断通路-反应关联来进行药物反应预测。
Bioinformatics. 2016 Sep 1;32(17):i455-i463. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw433.
7
Broad-based quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of potency and selectivity of farnesyltransferase inhibitors using a Bayesian regularized neural network.使用贝叶斯正则化神经网络对法尼基转移酶抑制剂的效力和选择性进行广泛的定量构效关系建模。
J Med Chem. 2004 Dec 2;47(25):6230-8. doi: 10.1021/jm049621j.
8
Prioritization of anticancer drugs against a cancer using genomic features of cancer cells: A step towards personalized medicine.利用癌细胞的基因组特征对癌症进行抗癌药物的优先级排序:迈向个性化医疗的一步。
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 31;6:23857. doi: 10.1038/srep23857.
9
A TOPological Sub-structural Molecular Design (TOPS-MODE)-QSAR approach for modeling the antiproliferative activity against murine leukemia tumor cell line (L1210).一种用于模拟对小鼠白血病肿瘤细胞系(L1210)抗增殖活性的拓扑亚结构分子设计(TOPS-MODE)-定量构效关系方法。
Bioorg Med Chem. 2009 Jan 15;17(2):537-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.11.084. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
10
Optimizing QSAR models for predicting ligand binding to the drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 isoenzyme CYP2D6.优化定量构效关系模型以预测配体与药物代谢细胞色素 P450 同工酶 CYP2D6 的结合。
Chem Biol Drug Des. 2011 Aug;78(2):236-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2011.01137.x. Epub 2011 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
UMAP-based clustering split for rigorous evaluation of AI models for virtual screening on cancer cell lines.基于UMAP的聚类划分,用于对癌细胞系虚拟筛选的人工智能模型进行严格评估。
J Cheminform. 2025 Jun 10;17(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13321-025-01039-8.
2
Data imbalance in drug response prediction: multi-objective optimization approach in deep learning setting.药物反应预测中的数据不平衡:深度学习环境下的多目标优化方法
Brief Bioinform. 2025 Mar 4;26(2). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf134.
3
Graph neural networks are promising for phenotypic virtual screening on cancer cell lines.
图神经网络在癌细胞系的表型虚拟筛选方面很有前景。
Biol Methods Protoc. 2024 Sep 3;9(1):bpae065. doi: 10.1093/biomethods/bpae065. eCollection 2024.
4
Single nucleotide and copy number variants of cancer driver genes inform drug response in multiple cancers.癌症驱动基因的单核苷酸和拷贝数变异可提示多种癌症的药物反应。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0306343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306343. eCollection 2024.
5
DBDNMF: A Dual Branch Deep Neural Matrix Factorization method for drug response prediction.DBDNMF:一种用于药物反应预测的双分支深度神经矩阵分解方法。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Apr 4;20(4):e1012012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012012. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
An NLP-based technique to extract meaningful features from drug SMILES.一种基于自然语言处理的从药物简化分子线性输入规范(SMILES)中提取有意义特征的技术。
iScience. 2024 Feb 8;27(3):109127. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109127. eCollection 2024 Mar 15.
7
GPDRP: a multimodal framework for drug response prediction with graph transformer.GPDRP:基于图转换器的药物反应预测多模态框架。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Dec 17;24(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05618-0.
8
Computational Approaches: A New Frontier in Cancer Research.计算方法:癌症研究的新前沿。
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2024;27(13):1861-1876. doi: 10.2174/0113862073265604231106112203.
9
Machine learning-driven exploration of drug therapies for triple-negative breast cancer treatment.机器学习驱动的三阴性乳腺癌治疗药物疗法探索。
Front Mol Biosci. 2023 Aug 4;10:1215204. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1215204. eCollection 2023.
10
Knowledge graph aids comprehensive explanation of drug and chemical toxicity.知识图谱辅助药物和化学毒性的全面阐释。
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023 Aug;12(8):1072-1079. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12975. Epub 2023 Jul 20.