Schulz Kurt P, Clerkin Suzanne M, Newcorn Jeffrey H, Halperin Jeffrey M, Fan Jin
Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychology, Purchase College of the State University of New York, Purchase, NY, USA.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Sep;24(9):1444-53. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.06.016. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
Functional interactions between amygdala and prefrontal cortex provide a cortical entry point for emotional cues to bias cognitive control. Stimulation of α2 adrenoceptors enhances the prefrontal control functions and blocks the amygdala-dependent encoding of emotional cues. However, the impact of this stimulation on amygdala-prefrontal interactions and the emotional biasing of cognitive control have not been established. We tested the effect of the α2 adrenoceptor agonist guanfacine on psychophysiological interactions of amygdala with prefrontal cortex for the emotional biasing of response execution and inhibition. Fifteen healthy adults were scanned twice with event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing an emotional go/no-go task following administration of oral guanfacine (1mg) and placebo in a double-blind, counterbalanced design. Happy, sad, and neutral faces served as trial cues. Guanfacine moderated the effect of face emotion on the task-related functional connectivity of left and right amygdala with left inferior frontal gyrus compared to placebo, by selectively reversing the functional co-activation of the two regions for response execution cued by sad faces. This shift from positively to negatively correlated activation for guanfacine was associated with selective improvements in the relatively low accuracy of responses to sad faces seen for placebo. These results demonstrate the importance of functional interactions between amygdala and inferior frontal gyrus to both bottom-up biasing of cognitive control and top-down control of emotional processing, as well as for the α2 adrenoceptor-mediated modulation of these processes. These mechanisms offer a possibile method to address the emotional reactivity that is common to several psychiatric disorders.
杏仁核与前额叶皮质之间的功能相互作用为情绪线索提供了一个皮质切入点,从而影响认知控制。刺激α2肾上腺素能受体会增强前额叶的控制功能,并阻断杏仁核依赖的情绪线索编码。然而,这种刺激对杏仁核 - 前额叶相互作用以及认知控制的情绪偏向的影响尚未明确。我们测试了α2肾上腺素能受体激动剂胍法辛对杏仁核与前额叶皮质心理生理相互作用的影响,该相互作用涉及反应执行和抑制的情绪偏向。15名健康成年人在双盲、平衡设计的口服胍法辛(1mg)和安慰剂后,通过事件相关功能磁共振成像进行两次扫描,同时执行情绪性的“去/不去”任务。快乐、悲伤和中性面孔作为试验线索。与安慰剂相比,胍法辛通过选择性地逆转悲伤面孔提示的反应执行时两个区域的功能共同激活,调节了面部情绪对左右杏仁核与左下额回任务相关功能连接的影响。胍法辛从正相关激活到负相关激活的这种转变与安慰剂组中对悲伤面孔反应相对较低的准确性的选择性改善有关。这些结果表明杏仁核与下额回之间的功能相互作用对于认知控制的自下而上偏向、情绪加工的自上而下控制以及α2肾上腺素能受体介导的这些过程的调节都很重要。这些机制为解决几种精神疾病共有的情绪反应性提供了一种可能的方法。