Ng J, Smith S D
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
J Evol Biol. 2014 Oct;27(10):2035-45. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12460. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
Biologists have long sought to understand the processes underlying disparities in clade size across the tree of life and the extent to which such clade size differences can be attributed to the evolution of particular traits. The association of certain character states with species-rich clades suggests that trait evolution can lead to increased diversification, but such a pattern could also arise due other processes, such as directional trait evolution. Recent advances in phylogenetic comparative methods have provided new statistical approaches for distinguishing between these intertwined and potentially confounded macroevolutionary processes. Here, we review the historical development of methods for detecting state-dependent diversification and explore what new methods have revealed about classic examples of traits that affect diversification, including evolutionary dead ends, key innovations and geographic traits. Applications of these methods thus far collectively suggest that trait diversity commonly arises through the complex interplay between transition, speciation and extinction rates and that long hypothesized evolutionary dead ends and key innovations are instead often cases of directional trends in trait evolution.
长期以来,生物学家一直试图了解生命之树上各分支大小差异背后的过程,以及这种分支大小差异在多大程度上可归因于特定性状的进化。某些性状状态与物种丰富的分支之间的关联表明,性状进化可导致多样化增加,但这种模式也可能因其他过程而出现,比如定向性状进化。系统发育比较方法的最新进展为区分这些相互交织且可能混淆的宏观进化过程提供了新的统计方法。在这里,我们回顾了检测状态依赖多样化方法的历史发展,并探讨了新方法对影响多样化的经典性状例子有哪些新发现,包括进化死胡同、关键创新和地理性状。迄今为止,这些方法的应用共同表明,性状多样性通常是通过转移、物种形成和灭绝速率之间的复杂相互作用而产生的,而且长期以来被认为的进化死胡同和关键创新,往往反而是性状进化中定向趋势的例子。