Greenfield Thomas K, Nayak Madhabika B, Bond Jason, Kerr William C, Ye Yu
Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Sep;38(9):2479-87. doi: 10.1111/acer.12480. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
Few studies assess reliability and validity of lifetime alcohol measures. We undertook extended test-retest analyses of retrospective lifetime drinking measures and of incremental predictive ability of lifetime heavy drinking (days 5+ drinks) in teens, 20s, and 30s for current (12-month) alcohol use disorders (AUDs).
A subset (31.4%; 962 men, 1,220 women) of the 2005 U.S. National Alcohol Survey (NAS; N11) completed a follow-up survey (N11T) by phone or mail (mean delay of 2.7 years). Both surveys assessed lifetime drinking.
In N11T, drinking status was reported consistently by 94.7% of N11 current drinkers, 85.5% of ex-drinkers, and 74.4% of lifetime abstainers (93.5% overall). Cumulative number of prior heavy drinking days (teens through 30s) were moderately consistent (Pearson's ρ = 0.6, p < 0.001, n = 1,636). Reliability was lower for younger respondents under 30 and higher for Whites versus Blacks and Hispanics (ρ = 0.68 vs. ρ = 0.56 vs. ρ = 0.56, both p = 0.01), but did not differ by gender. Heavy drinking days in teens correlated 0.63 (p < 0.001) for those aged 20 or older, higher for women than men and for Whites versus ethnic minorities. Heavy drinking days in the 20s and 30s reported by those 30 and older and 40 and older correlated at 0.63 and 0.67, respectively, being higher for Whites. Age of drinking onset and of lifetime maximum quantity reports were also consistent (0.65, 0.73), higher for women versus men, for those older than 29 versus younger, and for Whites versus Blacks and Hispanics. In N11, controlling for gender, age, ethnicity, and current 5+ frequency, cumulative prior 5+ days (teens to age 39) predicted current alcohol-related consequences and dependence (both p = 0.003).
Measurements of earlier heavy drinking are feasible, efficient, and reasonably reliable, albeit with some individual imprecision. Prior drinking data improve prediction of current AUDs, adjusting for demographics and current drinking.
很少有研究评估终生饮酒量测量方法的可靠性和有效性。我们对回顾性终生饮酒量测量方法以及青少年、20多岁和30多岁人群中终生重度饮酒(每天饮酒5杯及以上)对当前(12个月)酒精使用障碍(AUDs)的增量预测能力进行了扩展的重测分析。
2005年美国国家酒精调查(NAS;N11)的一个子集(31.4%;962名男性,1220名女性)通过电话或邮件完成了一项随访调查(N11T)(平均延迟2.7年)。两项调查均评估终生饮酒情况。
在N11T中,94.7%的N11当前饮酒者、85.5%的戒酒者和74.4%的终生戒酒者(总体为93.5%)对饮酒状况的报告一致。之前重度饮酒天数的累计数量(从青少年到30多岁)具有中等一致性(皮尔逊相关系数ρ = 0.6,p < 0.001,n = 1636)。30岁以下的年轻受访者可靠性较低,白人的可靠性高于黑人和西班牙裔(ρ = 0.68对ρ = 0.56对ρ = 0.56,p值均为0.01),但在性别上无差异。20岁及以上人群中,青少年时期的重度饮酒天数相关性为0.63(p < 0.001),女性高于男性,白人高于少数族裔。30岁及以上和40岁及以上人群报告的20多岁和30多岁时的重度饮酒天数相关性分别为0.63和0.67,白人的相关性更高。饮酒开始年龄和终生最大饮酒量报告也具有一致性(0.65,0.73),女性高于男性,29岁及以上者高于29岁以下者,白人高于黑人和西班牙裔。在N11中,在控制性别、年龄、种族和当前每天饮酒5杯及以上的频率后,之前累计5杯及以上饮酒天数(从青少年到39岁)可预测当前与酒精相关的后果和依赖(p值均为0.003)。
早期重度饮酒的测量是可行、高效且相当可靠的,尽管存在一些个体测量不精确性。调整人口统计学因素和当前饮酒情况后,既往饮酒数据可改善对当前酒精使用障碍的预测。