Smith Grace L, Smith Benjamin D
All authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 20;32(24):2669-78. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1168. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
In older patients, radiation treatment plays a vital role in curative and palliative cancer therapy. Radiation treatment recommendations should be informed by a comprehensive, personalized risk-benefit assessment that evaluates treatment efficacy and toxicity. We review several clinical factors that distinctly affect efficacy and toxicity of radiation treatment in older patients. First, locoregional tumor behavior may be more indolent in older patients for some disease sites but more aggressive for other sites. Assessment of expected locoregional relapse risk informs the magnitude and timeframe of expected radiation treatment benefits. Second, assessment of the competing cancer versus noncancer mortality and morbidity risks contextualizes cancer treatment priorities holistically within patients' entire spectrum and time course of health needs. Third, assessment of functional reserve helps predict patients' acute treatment tolerance, differentiating those patients who are unlikely to benefit from treatment or who are at high risk for treatment complications. Potential radiation treatment options include immediate curative treatment, delayed curative treatment, and no treatment, with additional consideration given to altered radiation target, dose, or sequencing with chemotherapy and/or surgery. Finally, when cure is not feasible, palliative radiation therapy remains valuable for managing symptoms and achieving meaningful quality-of-life improvements. Our proposed decision-making framework integrates these factors to help radiation oncologists formulate strategic treatment recommendations within a multidisciplinary context. Future research is still needed to identify how advanced technologies can be judiciously applied in curative and palliative settings to enhance risk-benefit profiles of radiation treatment in older patients and more accurately quantify treatment efficacy in this group.
在老年患者中,放射治疗在癌症的根治性和姑息性治疗中起着至关重要的作用。放射治疗建议应基于全面、个性化的风险效益评估,该评估需考量治疗效果和毒性。我们回顾了几个明显影响老年患者放射治疗效果和毒性的临床因素。首先,对于某些疾病部位,老年患者的局部区域肿瘤行为可能更为惰性,但对于其他部位则可能更具侵袭性。对预期局部区域复发风险的评估为预期放射治疗益处的大小和时间框架提供了依据。其次,对竞争性癌症与非癌症死亡率和发病率风险的评估,将癌症治疗优先级全面地置于患者整个健康需求谱和时间进程中。第三,对功能储备的评估有助于预测患者的急性治疗耐受性,区分那些不太可能从治疗中获益或有治疗并发症高风险的患者。潜在的放射治疗选择包括立即根治性治疗、延迟根治性治疗和不治疗,并额外考虑改变放射治疗靶点、剂量或与化疗和/或手术的顺序。最后,当治愈不可行时,姑息性放射治疗对于控制症状和实现有意义的生活质量改善仍然很有价值。我们提出的决策框架整合了这些因素,以帮助放射肿瘤学家在多学科背景下制定战略治疗建议。未来仍需开展研究,以确定如何在根治性和姑息性治疗环境中明智地应用先进技术,以改善老年患者放射治疗的风险效益状况,并更准确地量化该群体的治疗效果。