School of Government and Public Policy, University of Arizona, 306 Social Sciences, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA,
Environ Manage. 2014 Oct;54(4):768-81. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0334-7. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
Adaptation and the adaptive capacity of human and environmental systems have been of central concern to natural and social science scholars, many of whom characterize and promote the need for collaborative cross-boundary systems that are seen as flexible and adaptive by definition. Researchers who study collaborative governance systems in the public administration, planning and policy literature have paid less attention to adaptive capacity specifically and institutional adaptation in general. This paper bridges the two literatures and finds four common dimensions of capacity, including structural arrangements, leadership, knowledge and learning, and resources. In this paper, we focus on institutional adaptation in the context of collaborative governance regimes and try to clarify and distinguish collaborative capacity from adaptive capacity and their contributions to adaptive action. We posit further that collaborative capacities generate associated adaptive capacities thereby enabling institutional adaptation within collaborative governance regimes. We develop these distinctions and linkages between collaborative and adaptive capacities with the help of an illustrative case study in watershed management within the National Estuary Program.
适应和人类及环境系统的适应能力一直是自然科学和社会科学学者关注的核心问题,其中许多人对协作跨边界系统的特征和促进提出了需求,这些系统从定义上看具有灵活性和适应性。在公共行政、规划和政策文献中研究协作治理系统的研究人员则较少关注适应能力特别是体制适应能力。本文将这两个文献联系起来,发现了能力的四个共同维度,包括结构安排、领导力、知识和学习以及资源。在本文中,我们专注于协作治理制度背景下的体制适应,并试图澄清和区分协作能力与适应能力,以及它们对适应行动的贡献。我们进一步假设,协作能力产生相关的适应能力,从而使协作治理制度内的体制适应成为可能。我们在国家河口计划内的流域管理案例研究的帮助下,发展了协作能力和适应能力之间的这些区别和联系。