• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯层次分析方法在合并随机对照和单臂研究的荟萃分析中的应用。

Bayesian hierarchical methods for meta-analysis combining randomized-controlled and single-arm studies.

机构信息

1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

2 Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 May;28(5):1293-1310. doi: 10.1177/0962280218754928. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1177/0962280218754928
PMID:29433407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6719559/
Abstract

Meta-analysis of interventions usually relies on randomized controlled trials. However, when the dominant source of information comes from single-arm studies, or when the results from randomized controlled trials lack generalization due to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, it is vital to synthesize both sources of evidence. One challenge of synthesizing both sources is that single-arm studies are usually less reliable than randomized controlled trials due to selection bias and confounding factors. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian hierarchical framework for the purpose of bias reduction and efficiency gain. Under this framework, three methods are proposed: bivariate generalized linear mixed effects models, hierarchical power prior model and hierarchical commensurate prior model. Design difference and potential biases are considered in all models, within which the hierarchical power prior and hierarchical commensurate prior models further offer to downweight single-arm studies flexibly. The hierarchical commensurate prior model is recommended as the primary method for evidence synthesis because of its accuracy and robustness. We illustrate our methods by applying all models to two motivating datasets and evaluate their performance through simulation studies. We finish with a discussion of the advantages and limitations of our methods, as well as directions for future research in this area.

摘要

元分析通常依赖于随机对照试验。然而,当主要信息来源来自单臂研究时,或者当由于严格的纳入和排除标准,随机对照试验的结果缺乏普遍性时,综合这两种来源的证据就显得至关重要。综合这两种来源的一个挑战是,由于选择偏差和混杂因素,单臂研究通常不如随机对照试验可靠。在本文中,我们提出了一个贝叶斯分层框架,旨在减少偏差和提高效率。在这个框架下,提出了三种方法:双变量广义线性混合效应模型、分层幂先验模型和分层相称先验模型。所有模型都考虑了设计差异和潜在偏差,其中分层幂先验和分层相称先验模型进一步提供了灵活地下调单臂研究的权重的方法。由于其准确性和稳健性,我们推荐使用分层相称先验模型作为主要的证据综合方法。我们通过将所有模型应用于两个激励性数据集来说明我们的方法,并通过模拟研究评估它们的性能。最后,我们讨论了我们方法的优缺点,以及该领域未来研究的方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c30/6719559/82c860589952/nihms-1046443-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c30/6719559/1bb5731aa5f2/nihms-1046443-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c30/6719559/375af28cb4fc/nihms-1046443-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c30/6719559/1fcbbf3fee15/nihms-1046443-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c30/6719559/92a634f2ad24/nihms-1046443-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c30/6719559/ba8872d9a55f/nihms-1046443-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c30/6719559/82c860589952/nihms-1046443-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c30/6719559/1bb5731aa5f2/nihms-1046443-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c30/6719559/375af28cb4fc/nihms-1046443-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c30/6719559/1fcbbf3fee15/nihms-1046443-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c30/6719559/92a634f2ad24/nihms-1046443-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c30/6719559/ba8872d9a55f/nihms-1046443-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c30/6719559/82c860589952/nihms-1046443-f0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayesian hierarchical methods for meta-analysis combining randomized-controlled and single-arm studies.贝叶斯层次分析方法在合并随机对照和单臂研究的荟萃分析中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 May;28(5):1293-1310. doi: 10.1177/0962280218754928. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Meta-analysis combining parallel and cross-over trials with random effects.合并平行和交叉试验的随机效应的荟萃分析。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Sep;8(3):263-274. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1236. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
4
Allowing for uncertainty due to missing data in meta-analysis--part 2: hierarchical models.考虑到荟萃分析中因数据缺失导致的不确定性——第2部分:分层模型。
Stat Med. 2008 Feb 28;27(5):728-45. doi: 10.1002/sim.3007.
5
Bayesian Equivalence Testing and Meta-Analysis in Two-Arm Trials with Binary Data.二元数据双臂试验中的贝叶斯等效性检验与荟萃分析
Comput Math Methods Med. 2018 Aug 8;2018:8134132. doi: 10.1155/2018/8134132. eCollection 2018.
6
A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.一种用于随机临床试验中安全信号检测的贝叶斯荟萃分析方法。
Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;14(2):192-200. doi: 10.1177/1740774516683920. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
7
The importance of adjusting for potential confounders in Bayesian hierarchical models synthesising evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies: an application comparing treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysms.贝叶斯层次模型中调整潜在混杂因素的重要性:应用于比较腹主动脉瘤治疗方法的随机和非随机研究证据综合。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jul 9;10:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-64.
8
A Bayesian bias-adjusted random-effects model for synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies of interventions.贝叶斯偏倚调整的随机效应模型,用于综合来自干预措施的随机对照试验和非随机研究的证据。
J Evid Based Med. 2024 Sep;17(3):550-558. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12633. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
9
Incorporating single-arm studies in meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.将单臂研究纳入随机对照试验的荟萃分析:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 3;21(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01301-1.
10
A Bayesian missing data framework for generalized multiple outcome mixed treatment comparisons.用于广义多结局混合治疗比较的贝叶斯缺失数据框架。
Res Synth Methods. 2016 Mar;7(1):6-22. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1153. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Tipping point analysis for the between-arm correlation in an arm-based evidence synthesis.基于手臂的证据综合中臂间相关性的临界点分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jul 25;24(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02263-w.
2
A review and comparison of arm-based versus contrast-based network meta-analysis for binary outcomes-Understanding their differences and limitations.基于臂间比较与基于对照的网络Meta分析用于二元结局的综述与比较——理解它们的差异和局限性
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2024 Jan-Feb;16(1). doi: 10.1002/wics.1639. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
Assessing the relative effectiveness of various ultrasound-guided ablation techniques for treating benign thyroid nodules: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Performing Arm-Based Network Meta-Analysis in R with the pcnetmeta Package.使用pcnetmeta软件包在R中进行基于手臂的网络荟萃分析。
J Stat Softw. 2017 Aug;80. doi: 10.18637/jss.v080.i05. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
2
The Impact of Excluding Trials from Network Meta-Analyses - An Empirical Study.排除试验对网状Meta分析的影响——一项实证研究
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 7;11(12):e0165889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165889. eCollection 2016.
3
A Bayesian missing data framework for generalized multiple outcome mixed treatment comparisons.用于广义多结局混合治疗比较的贝叶斯缺失数据框架。
评估各种超声引导下消融技术治疗良性甲状腺结节的相对有效性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 3;103(18):e38014. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038014.
4
Sequential regression and simulation: a method for estimating causal effects from heterogeneous clinical trials without a common control group.序贯回归与模拟:一种在缺乏共同对照组的异质临床试验中估计因果效应的方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 3;23(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02020-5.
5
Data Integration in Causal Inference.因果推断中的数据整合
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2023 Jan-Feb;15(1). doi: 10.1002/wics.1581. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
6
Bayesian hierarchical model-based network meta-analysis to overcome survival extrapolation challenges caused by data immaturity.基于贝叶斯层次模型的网络荟萃分析克服数据不成熟导致的生存外推挑战。
J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Mar;12(3):e220159. doi: 10.2217/cer-2022-0159. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
7
BRIDGING RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AND SINGLE-ARM TRIALS USING COMMENSURATE PRIORS IN ARM-BASED NETWORK META-ANALYSIS.在基于臂的网络荟萃分析中使用相称先验将随机对照试验和单臂试验联系起来
Ann Appl Stat. 2021 Dec;15(4):1767-1787. doi: 10.1214/21-aoas1469. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
8
Bayesian network meta-analysis methods for combining individual participant data and aggregate data from single arm trials and randomised controlled trials.贝叶斯网络荟萃分析方法,用于合并来自单臂试验和随机对照试验的个体参与者数据和汇总数据。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01657-y.
9
Prevalence of Healed Plaque and Factors Influencing Its Characteristics Under Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.冠状动脉疾病患者光学相干断层扫描下愈合斑块的患病率及其特征的影响因素:一项系统评价、Meta分析和Meta回归分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 22;8:761208. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.761208. eCollection 2021.
10
Incorporating single-arm studies in meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.将单臂研究纳入随机对照试验的荟萃分析:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 3;21(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01301-1.
Res Synth Methods. 2016 Mar;7(1):6-22. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1153. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
4
Rejoinder to the discussion of "a Bayesian missing data framework for generalized multiple outcome mixed treatment comparisons," by S. Dias and A. E. Ades.对S. Dias和A. E. Ades所著《广义多结局混合治疗比较的贝叶斯缺失数据框架》讨论的回应
Res Synth Methods. 2016 Mar;7(1):29-33. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1186. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
5
Absolute or relative effects? Arm-based synthesis of trial data.绝对效应还是相对效应?基于组的试验数据综合分析
Res Synth Methods. 2016 Mar;7(1):23-8. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1184. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
6
The power prior: theory and applications.功率先验:理论与应用。
Stat Med. 2015 Dec 10;34(28):3724-49. doi: 10.1002/sim.6728. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
7
Bayesian hierarchical models for network meta-analysis incorporating nonignorable missingness.用于网络荟萃分析的贝叶斯分层模型,纳入不可忽略的缺失值。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Oct;26(5):2227-2243. doi: 10.1177/0962280215596185. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
8
Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in clinical research: a review of methods and applications.临床研究中随机和非随机证据的结合:方法与应用综述
Res Synth Methods. 2015 Mar;6(1):45-62. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1122. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
9
Detecting outlying trials in network meta-analysis.在网状Meta分析中检测异常试验
Stat Med. 2015 Aug 30;34(19):2695-707. doi: 10.1002/sim.6509. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
10
An alternative pseudolikelihood method for multivariate random-effects meta-analysis.多元随机效应荟萃分析的一种替代拟似然方法。
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 10;34(3):361-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.6350. Epub 2014 Nov 3.