Kendon Adam
Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6228, USA Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, WC1H 0AP, UK
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 19;369(1651):20130293. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0293.
Sign language descriptions that use an analytic model borrowed from spoken language structural linguistics have proved to be not fully appropriate. Pictorial and action-like modes of expression are integral to how signed utterances are constructed and to how they work. However, observation shows that speakers likewise use kinesic and vocal expressions that are not accommodated by spoken language structural linguistic models, including pictorial and action-like modes of expression. These, also, are integral to how speaker utterances in face-to-face interaction are constructed and to how they work. Accordingly, the object of linguistic inquiry should be revised, so that it comprises not only an account of the formal abstract systems that utterances make use of, but also an account of how the semiotically diverse resources that all languaging individuals use are organized in relation to one another. Both language as an abstract system and languaging should be the concern of linguistics.
事实证明,借鉴口语结构语言学分析模型的手语描述并不完全合适。图像化和类似动作的表达模式对于手语话语的构建方式及其运作方式至关重要。然而,观察表明,说者同样会使用口语结构语言模型无法涵盖的身势语和发声表达,包括图像化和类似动作的表达模式。这些对于面对面互动中说者话语的构建方式及其运作方式也至关重要。因此,语言学探究的对象应予以修正,使其不仅包括对话语所使用的形式抽象系统的描述,还包括对所有语言使用者所使用的符号学上多样的资源如何相互组织的描述。作为抽象系统的语言和语言运用都应成为语言学关注的对象。