Winter Bodo, Marghetis Tyler
Department of English Language and Linguistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 26;14:1130777. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130777. eCollection 2023.
Modern society depends on numerical information, which must be communicated accurately and effectively. Numerical communication is accomplished in different modalities-speech, writing, sign, gesture, graphs, and in naturally occurring settings it almost always involves more than one modality at once. Yet the modalities of numerical communication are often studied in isolation. Here we argue that, to understand and improve numerical communication, we must take seriously this multimodality. We first discuss each modality on its own terms, identifying their commonalities and differences. We then argue that numerical communication is shaped critically by interactions among modalities. We boil down these interactions to four types: one modality can the message of another; it can attention to content from another modality (e.g., using a gesture to guide attention to a relevant aspect of a graph); it can another modality (e.g., verbally explaining the meaning of an axis in a graph); and it can a modality (e.g., framing an upwards-oriented trend as a bad outcome). We conclude by discussing how a focus on multimodality raises entirely new research questions about numerical communication.
现代社会依赖于数字信息,这些信息必须准确且有效地进行传达。数字交流通过不同的方式来实现——言语、书写、手势、符号、图表,并且在自然场景中,它几乎总是同时涉及多种方式。然而,数字交流的这些方式常常被孤立地研究。在此我们认为,为了理解和改进数字交流,我们必须认真对待这种多模态性。我们首先分别讨论每种方式,识别它们的共性与差异。然后我们认为,数字交流在很大程度上是由不同方式之间的相互作用所塑造的。我们将这些相互作用归纳为四种类型:一种方式可以增强另一种方式的信息;它可以将注意力引向来自另一种方式的内容(例如,用一个手势引导对图表相关方面的关注);它可以解释另一种方式(例如,口头解释图表中一个轴的含义);并且它可以构建一种方式(例如,将向上的趋势描述为一个不好的结果)。我们通过讨论对多模态性的关注如何引发关于数字交流的全新研究问题来结束本文。