Center for Subjectivity Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Denmark.
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 23;5:798. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00798. eCollection 2014.
In this paper, I address the question of how to account for the normative dimension involved in conceptual competence in a naturalistic framework. First, I present what I call the naturalist challenge (NC), referring to both the phylogenetic and ontogenetic dimensions of conceptual possession and acquisition. I then criticize two models that have been dominant in thinking about conceptual competence, the interpretationist and the causalist models. Both fail to meet NC, by failing to account for the abilities involved in conceptual self-correction. I then offer an alternative account of self-correction that I develop with the help of the interactionist theory of mutual understanding arising from recent developments in phenomenology and developmental psychology.
在本文中,我探讨了如何在自然主义框架内解释概念能力中涉及的规范性维度。首先,我提出了所谓的自然主义挑战(NC),指的是概念拥有和获得的种系发生和个体发生两个维度。然后,我批评了两种在思考概念能力方面占主导地位的模型,解释主义和因果主义模型。这两种模型都没有满足 NC,因为它们没有解释概念自我纠正所涉及的能力。然后,我提出了一种替代的自我纠正解释,我在现象学和发展心理学的最新发展中出现的相互理解的互动主义理论的帮助下发展了这种解释。