Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
PLoS One. 2010 May 12;5(5):e10544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010544.
It is still unclear which observational learning mechanisms underlie the transmission of difficult problem-solving skills in chimpanzees. In particular, two different mechanisms have been proposed: imitation and emulation. Previous studies have largely failed to control for social factors when these mechanisms were targeted.
In an attempt to resolve the existing discrepancies, we adopted the 'floating peanut task', in which subjects need to spit water into a tube until it is sufficiently full for floating peanuts to be grasped. In a previous study only a few chimpanzees were able to invent the necessary solution (and they either did so in their first trials or never). Here we compared success levels in baseline tests with two experimental conditions that followed: 1) A full model condition to test whether social demonstrations would be effective, and 2) A social emulation control condition, in which a human experimenter poured water from a bottle into the tube, to test whether results information alone (present in both experimental conditions) would also induce successes. Crucially, we controlled for social factors in both experimental conditions. Both types of demonstrations significantly increased successful spitting, with no differences between demonstration types. We also found that younger subjects were more likely to succeed than older ones. Our analysis showed that mere order effects could not explain our results.
The full demonstration condition (which potentially offers additional information to observers, in the form of actions), induced no more successes than the emulation condition. Hence, emulation learning could explain the success in both conditions. This finding has broad implications for the interpretation of chimpanzee traditions, for which emulation learning may perhaps suffice.
目前尚不清楚哪些观察学习机制是黑猩猩在解决难题时技能传递的基础。特别是,已经提出了两种不同的机制:模仿和效仿。当针对这些机制时,之前的研究在很大程度上未能控制社会因素。
为了解决现有的差异,我们采用了“漂浮花生任务”,在这个任务中,受试者需要将水吐入管中,直到水足够满以使漂浮的花生能够被抓住。在之前的一项研究中,只有少数几只黑猩猩能够发明出必要的解决方案(他们要么在第一次尝试中就做到了,要么从未做到过)。在这里,我们将基线测试中的成功率与以下两种实验条件进行了比较:1)完整模型条件,以测试社会示范是否有效,以及 2)社会效仿控制条件,其中人类实验员将水从瓶子倒入管中,以测试仅提供结果信息(存在于两种实验条件中)是否也会导致成功。至关重要的是,我们在两种实验条件下都控制了社会因素。两种类型的示范都显著增加了成功的喷水次数,而且示范类型之间没有差异。我们还发现,年轻的受试者比年长的受试者更有可能成功。我们的分析表明,仅仅是顺序效应不能解释我们的结果。
完整的示范条件(可能以动作的形式为观察者提供了额外的信息)并没有比效仿条件产生更多的成功。因此,效仿学习可以解释两种条件下的成功。这一发现对黑猩猩传统的解释具有广泛的影响,对于模仿学习可能足以解释的传统,这一发现可能具有重要意义。