Hughes B P, Anund A, Falkmer T
School of Occupational Therapy and Social Work, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Swedish Road and Transport Research Institute, 581 95 Linköping, Sweden.
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jan;74:271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.017. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
Road safety strategies represent interventions on a complex social technical system level. An understanding of a theoretical basis and description is required for strategies to be structured and developed. Road safety strategies are described as systems, but have not been related to the theory, principles and basis by which systems have been developed and analysed. Recently, road safety strategies, which have been employed for many years in different countries, have moved to a 'vision zero', or 'safe system' style. The aim of this study was to analyse the successful Swedish, United Kingdom and Dutch road safety strategies against the older, and newer, Australian road safety strategies, with respect to their foundations in system theory and safety models. Analysis of the strategies against these foundations could indicate potential improvements. The content of four modern cases of road safety strategy was compared against each other, reviewed against scientific systems theory and reviewed against types of safety model. The strategies contained substantial similarities, but were different in terms of fundamental constructs and principles, with limited theoretical basis. The results indicate that the modern strategies do not include essential aspects of systems theory that describe relationships and interdependencies between key components. The description of these strategies as systems is therefore not well founded and deserves further development.
道路安全策略代表着在复杂的社会技术系统层面上的干预措施。要构建和制定策略,需要理解其理论基础并进行描述。道路安全策略被描述为系统,但尚未与系统开发和分析所依据的理论、原则和基础联系起来。最近,在不同国家已采用多年的道路安全策略已转向“零愿景”或“安全系统”模式。本研究的目的是根据系统理论和安全模型的基础,分析瑞典、英国和荷兰成功的道路安全策略与澳大利亚较旧和较新的道路安全策略。针对这些基础对策略进行分析可以指出潜在的改进之处。将四个现代道路安全策略案例的内容相互比较,对照科学系统理论进行审查,并对照安全模型类型进行审查。这些策略有很多相似之处,但在基本结构和原则方面存在差异,理论基础有限。结果表明,现代策略没有涵盖系统理论中描述关键组件之间关系和相互依存性的基本方面。因此,将这些策略描述为系统没有充分依据,值得进一步探讨。