Naumann Rebecca B, LaJeunesse Seth, Keefe Elyse, Heiny Stephen, Lich Kristen Hassmiller, Jones Ki'yonna, Evenson Kelly R
Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Front Future Transp. 2023 Jan;4. doi: 10.3389/ffutr.2023.923786.
While collaboration and cooperation are regarded as foundational to Vision Zero (VZ) and Safe Systems initiatives, there is little guidance on structuring VZ collaboration, conducting collaborative goal setting, and aligning tangible action across organizations. As part of a larger VZ mutual learning model, we developed a VZ Leadership Team Institute to support communities in collaborative VZ strategic planning and goal setting. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and evaluation of the Institute, which can serve as a foundation for other initiatives seeking to move VZ planning and implementation forward in a collaborative, systems-aware manner. In June 2021, eight multi-disciplinary teams of 3-6 persons each (n=42 participants) attended the Institute, representing leaders from communities of various sizes. Surveys were administered pre, immediately post, and six months following the Institute. We measured confidence in a range of skills (on a 5-point scale, 1: not confident to 5: very confident). The largest increases in confidence from pre- to immediately post-Institute were for collaboratively drafting objectives and actions for VZ goals (pre-mean:2.6, SD:0.9 to post-mean:3.8, SD:0.9); incorporating equity into goals (pre-mean:2.8, SD:1.0 to post-mean:3.9, SD:0.8); and knowing how to keep VZ planning and implementation efforts on track (pre-mean:2.6, SD:1.0 to post-mean:3.7, SD:0.7). For all measures, average confidence in skills decreased from immediately post-Institute to six months post-Institute, but remained greater than average scores pre-Institute. Surveys also measured coalition collaboration pre-Institute and six months post-Institute (on a 4-point scale, 1: strongly disagree to 4: strongly agree). Several measures maintained high agreement across time, and mean agreement increased for reporting that the future direction of the coalition was clearly communicated to everyone (pre-mean:2.6, SD:0.8; six months post-mean:3.1, SD:0.4) and decreased for feeling like the coalition had adequate staffing (pre-mean:3.0, SD:0.6; six months post-mean:2.3, SD:0.5). The Institute utilized innovative content, tools, and examples to support VZ coalitions' collaborative and systems-aware planning and implementation processes. As communities work toward zero transportation deaths and serious injuries, providing effective support models to aid multidisciplinary planning and action around a Safe Systems approach will be important to accelerate progress toward a safer transportation system.
虽然协作与合作被视为零愿景(VZ)和安全系统倡议的基础,但在构建VZ协作、进行协作目标设定以及使各组织间的切实行动保持一致方面,几乎没有相关指导。作为更大的VZ相互学习模式的一部分,我们开发了一个VZ领导团队学院,以支持各社区进行协作性的VZ战略规划和目标设定。本文旨在描述该学院的发展与评估情况,它可为其他寻求以协作性、系统意识方式推进VZ规划与实施的倡议提供基础。2021年6月,8个由3至6人组成的多学科团队(共42名参与者)参加了该学院,代表了不同规模社区的领导者。在学院培训前、培训结束后立即以及培训结束六个月后进行了调查。我们衡量了一系列技能方面的信心(采用5分制,1分表示不自信,5分表示非常自信)。从培训前到培训结束后立即,信心提升幅度最大的方面包括:为VZ目标协作起草目标和行动(培训前均值:2.6,标准差:0.9;培训后均值:3.8,标准差:0.9);将公平纳入目标(培训前均值:2.8,标准差:1.0;培训后均值:3.9,标准差:0.8);以及知道如何使VZ规划和实施工作步入正轨(培训前均值:2.6,标准差:1.0;培训后均值:3.7,标准差:0.7)。对于所有指标,从培训结束后立即到培训结束六个月后,技能方面的平均信心有所下降,但仍高于培训前的平均得分。调查还衡量了培训前和培训结束六个月后的联盟协作情况(采用4分制,1分表示强烈不同意,4分表示强烈同意)。一些指标在不同时间保持了高度一致性,对于报告联盟的未来方向已清晰传达给每个人这一情况,平均一致性有所增加(培训前均值:2.6,标准差:0.8;培训结束六个月后均值:3.1,标准差:0.4),而对于感觉联盟有足够人员配备这一情况,平均一致性则有所下降(培训前均值:3.0,标准差:0.6;培训结束六个月后均值:2.3,标准差:0.5)。该学院利用创新的内容、工具和实例来支持VZ联盟的协作性和系统意识规划与实施过程。随着各社区努力实现交通死亡和重伤零目标,提供有效的支持模式以协助围绕安全系统方法进行多学科规划和行动,对于加速迈向更安全交通系统的进程将至关重要。