• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Novel Vision Zero Leadership Training Model to Support Collaboration and Strategic Action Planning.一种支持协作与战略行动计划的新型零愿景领导力培训模式。
Front Future Transp. 2023 Jan;4. doi: 10.3389/ffutr.2023.923786.
2
Organizational networks in road safety: Case studies of U.S. Vision Zero cities.道路安全组织网络:美国“零愿景”城市案例研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(4):378-385. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1587752. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
3
Mixed-methods approach to describing Vision Zero initiatives in United States' municipalities.混合方法描述美国市级“零愿景”计划。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 May;184:107012. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107012. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
4
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
5
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Public Health Involvement in United States' Vision Zero Initiatives: A Mixed-Methods Study.公共卫生在美国“零愿景”计划中的参与:一项混合方法研究。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30(4):567-577. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001988. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
9
Developing a national dissemination plan for collaborative care for depression: QUERI Series.制定抑郁症协同护理的全国推广计划:QUERI 系列。
Implement Sci. 2008 Dec 31;3:59. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-59.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Health Involvement in United States' Vision Zero Initiatives: A Mixed-Methods Study.公共卫生在美国“零愿景”计划中的参与:一项混合方法研究。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30(4):567-577. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001988. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Systems thinking in the context of road safety: Can systems tools help us realize a true "Safe Systems" approach?道路安全背景下的系统思维:系统工具能否帮助我们实现真正的“安全系统”方法?
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2020;7(4):343-351. doi: 10.1007/s40471-020-00248-z.
2
Moving Knowledge to Action: Applying Community Coalition Action Theory (CCAT) to Bus Seat Belt Usage.将知识转化为行动:将社区联盟行动理论(CCAT)应用于公交车安全带使用情况
J Lifestyle Med. 2021 Jan 31;11(1):8-12. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2021.11.1.8.
3
Consolidated Framework for Collaboration Research derived from a systematic review of theories, models, frameworks and principles for cross-sector collaboration.协作研究综合框架源自对跨部门协作的理论、模型、框架和原则的系统回顾。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 4;16(1):e0244501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244501. eCollection 2021.
4
Using the Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory to Strengthen Collaborations for Improving Maternal and Child Health.利用怀尔德协作因素量表加强改善母婴健康的协作。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Mar;25(3):377-384. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03091-2. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
5
Evaluating Food Policy Councils Using Structural Equation Modeling.运用结构方程模型评估食品政策委员会。
Am J Community Psychol. 2018 Mar;61(1-2):251-264. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12207. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
6
Food Policy Council Self-Assessment Tool: Development, Testing, and Results.食品政策委员会自我评估工具:开发、测试与结果
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Mar 2;14:E20. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160281.
7
Vision zero: a toolkit for road safety in the modern era.零愿景:现代道路安全工具包。
Inj Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40621-016-0098-z. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
8
System theory and safety models in Swedish, UK, Dutch and Australian road safety strategies.瑞典、英国、荷兰和澳大利亚道路安全战略中的系统理论与安全模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jan;74:271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.017. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
9
Organizational climate and culture.组织氛围和文化。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:361-88. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
10
Vision Zero--a road safety policy innovation.零愿景——道路安全政策创新。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2012;19(2):171-9. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2011.635213. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

一种支持协作与战略行动计划的新型零愿景领导力培训模式。

A Novel Vision Zero Leadership Training Model to Support Collaboration and Strategic Action Planning.

作者信息

Naumann Rebecca B, LaJeunesse Seth, Keefe Elyse, Heiny Stephen, Lich Kristen Hassmiller, Jones Ki'yonna, Evenson Kelly R

机构信息

Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

出版信息

Front Future Transp. 2023 Jan;4. doi: 10.3389/ffutr.2023.923786.

DOI:10.3389/ffutr.2023.923786
PMID:39781214
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11708305/
Abstract

While collaboration and cooperation are regarded as foundational to Vision Zero (VZ) and Safe Systems initiatives, there is little guidance on structuring VZ collaboration, conducting collaborative goal setting, and aligning tangible action across organizations. As part of a larger VZ mutual learning model, we developed a VZ Leadership Team Institute to support communities in collaborative VZ strategic planning and goal setting. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and evaluation of the Institute, which can serve as a foundation for other initiatives seeking to move VZ planning and implementation forward in a collaborative, systems-aware manner. In June 2021, eight multi-disciplinary teams of 3-6 persons each (n=42 participants) attended the Institute, representing leaders from communities of various sizes. Surveys were administered pre, immediately post, and six months following the Institute. We measured confidence in a range of skills (on a 5-point scale, 1: not confident to 5: very confident). The largest increases in confidence from pre- to immediately post-Institute were for collaboratively drafting objectives and actions for VZ goals (pre-mean:2.6, SD:0.9 to post-mean:3.8, SD:0.9); incorporating equity into goals (pre-mean:2.8, SD:1.0 to post-mean:3.9, SD:0.8); and knowing how to keep VZ planning and implementation efforts on track (pre-mean:2.6, SD:1.0 to post-mean:3.7, SD:0.7). For all measures, average confidence in skills decreased from immediately post-Institute to six months post-Institute, but remained greater than average scores pre-Institute. Surveys also measured coalition collaboration pre-Institute and six months post-Institute (on a 4-point scale, 1: strongly disagree to 4: strongly agree). Several measures maintained high agreement across time, and mean agreement increased for reporting that the future direction of the coalition was clearly communicated to everyone (pre-mean:2.6, SD:0.8; six months post-mean:3.1, SD:0.4) and decreased for feeling like the coalition had adequate staffing (pre-mean:3.0, SD:0.6; six months post-mean:2.3, SD:0.5). The Institute utilized innovative content, tools, and examples to support VZ coalitions' collaborative and systems-aware planning and implementation processes. As communities work toward zero transportation deaths and serious injuries, providing effective support models to aid multidisciplinary planning and action around a Safe Systems approach will be important to accelerate progress toward a safer transportation system.

摘要

虽然协作与合作被视为零愿景(VZ)和安全系统倡议的基础,但在构建VZ协作、进行协作目标设定以及使各组织间的切实行动保持一致方面,几乎没有相关指导。作为更大的VZ相互学习模式的一部分,我们开发了一个VZ领导团队学院,以支持各社区进行协作性的VZ战略规划和目标设定。本文旨在描述该学院的发展与评估情况,它可为其他寻求以协作性、系统意识方式推进VZ规划与实施的倡议提供基础。2021年6月,8个由3至6人组成的多学科团队(共42名参与者)参加了该学院,代表了不同规模社区的领导者。在学院培训前、培训结束后立即以及培训结束六个月后进行了调查。我们衡量了一系列技能方面的信心(采用5分制,1分表示不自信,5分表示非常自信)。从培训前到培训结束后立即,信心提升幅度最大的方面包括:为VZ目标协作起草目标和行动(培训前均值:2.6,标准差:0.9;培训后均值:3.8,标准差:0.9);将公平纳入目标(培训前均值:2.8,标准差:1.0;培训后均值:3.9,标准差:0.8);以及知道如何使VZ规划和实施工作步入正轨(培训前均值:2.6,标准差:1.0;培训后均值:3.7,标准差:0.7)。对于所有指标,从培训结束后立即到培训结束六个月后,技能方面的平均信心有所下降,但仍高于培训前的平均得分。调查还衡量了培训前和培训结束六个月后的联盟协作情况(采用4分制,1分表示强烈不同意,4分表示强烈同意)。一些指标在不同时间保持了高度一致性,对于报告联盟的未来方向已清晰传达给每个人这一情况,平均一致性有所增加(培训前均值:2.6,标准差:0.8;培训结束六个月后均值:3.1,标准差:0.4),而对于感觉联盟有足够人员配备这一情况,平均一致性则有所下降(培训前均值:3.0,标准差:0.6;培训结束六个月后均值:2.3,标准差:0.5)。该学院利用创新的内容、工具和实例来支持VZ联盟的协作性和系统意识规划与实施过程。随着各社区努力实现交通死亡和重伤零目标,提供有效的支持模式以协助围绕安全系统方法进行多学科规划和行动,对于加速迈向更安全交通系统的进程将至关重要。