Sánchez M C, Llama-Palacios A, Fernández E, Figuero E, Marín M J, León R, Blanc V, Herrera D, Sanz M
Laboratory of Dental Research, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain.
Dentaid SA, Barcelona, Spain.
Dent Mater. 2014 Oct;30(10):1161-71. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
The impact of implant surfaces in dental biofilm development is presently unknown. The aim of this investigation was to assess in vitro the development of a complex biofilm model on titanium and zirconium implant surfaces, and to compare it with the same biofilm formed on hydroxyapatite surface.
Six standard reference strains were used to develop an in vitro biofilm over sterile titanium, zirconium and hydroxyapatite discs, coated with saliva within the wells of pre-sterilized polystyrene tissue culture plates. The selected species used represent initial (Streptococcus oralis and Actinomyces naeslundii), early (Veillonella parvula), secondary (Fusobacterium nucleatum) and late colonizers (Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans). The developed biofilms (growth time 1 to 120h) were studied with confocal laser scanning microscopy using a vital fluorescence technique and with low-temperature scanning electron microscopy. The number (colony forming units/biofilm) and kinetics of the bacteria within the biofilm were studied with quantitative PCR (qPCR). As outcome variables, the biofilm thickness, the percentage of cell vitality and the number of bacteria were compared using the analysis of variance.
The bacteria adhered and matured within the biofilm over the three surfaces with similar dynamics. Different surfaces, however, demonstrated differences both in the thickness, deposition of the extracellular polysaccharide matrix as well as in the organization of the bacterial cells.
While the formation and dynamics of an in vitro biofilm model was similar irrespective of the surface of inoculation (hydroxyapatite, titanium or zirconium), there were significant differences in regards to the biofilm thickness and three-dimensional structure.
目前尚不清楚种植体表面对口腔生物膜形成的影响。本研究旨在体外评估在钛和锆种植体表面形成的复杂生物膜模型,并将其与在羟基磷灰石表面形成的相同生物膜进行比较。
使用六种标准参考菌株在无菌的钛、锆和羟基磷灰石圆盘上形成体外生物膜,这些圆盘放置在预先灭菌的聚苯乙烯组织培养板孔内,并涂有唾液。所选的菌株代表早期定植菌(口腔链球菌和内氏放线菌)、早期菌(微小韦荣球菌)、中期菌(具核梭杆菌)和晚期定植菌(牙龈卟啉单胞菌和伴放线聚集杆菌)。使用活体荧光技术通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜和低温扫描电子显微镜对形成的生物膜(生长时间1至120小时)进行研究。通过定量PCR(qPCR)研究生物膜内细菌的数量(菌落形成单位/生物膜)和动力学。作为结果变量,使用方差分析比较生物膜厚度、细胞活力百分比和细菌数量。
细菌在三种表面的生物膜内以相似的动力学方式黏附并成熟。然而,不同表面在生物膜厚度、细胞外多糖基质的沉积以及细菌细胞的组织方式上均表现出差异。
尽管体外生物膜模型的形成和动力学与接种表面(羟基磷灰石、钛或锆)无关,但在生物膜厚度和三维结构方面存在显著差异。