Suppr超能文献

评估修订后的两因素学习过程问卷(R-SPQ2F)在加纳医学生中的信度和效度。

Assessing the reliability and validity of the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ2F) in Ghanaian medical students.

作者信息

Mogre Victor, Amalba Anthony

机构信息

Education Unit, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.

出版信息

J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014 Aug 15;11:19. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.19. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We investigated the validity and reliability of the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ2F) in preclinical students in Ghana.

METHODS

The R-SPQ2F was administered to 189 preclinical students of the University for Development Studies, School of Medicine and Health Sciences. Both descriptive and inferential statistics with Cronbach's alpha test and factor analysis were done.

RESULTS

The mean age of the students was 22.69± 0.18years, 60.8% (n=115) were males and 42.3% (n=80) were in their second year of medical training. The students had higher mean deep approach scores (31.23±7.19) than that of surface approach scores (22.62±6.48). Findings of the R-SPQ2F gave credence to a solution of two-factors indicating deep and surface approaches accounting for 49.80% and 33.57%, respectively, of the variance. The scales of deep approach (Cronbach's alpha, 0.80) and surface approach (Cronbach's alpha, 0.76) and their subscales demonstrated an internal consistency that was good. The factorial validity was comparable to other studies.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms the construct validity and internal consistency of the R-SPQ2F for measuring approaches to learning in Ghanaian preclinical students. Deep approach was the most dominant learning approach among the students. The questionnaire can be used to measure students' approaches to learning in Ghana and in other African countries.

摘要

目的

我们调查了修订后的双因素学习过程问卷(R-SPQ2F)在加纳临床前学生中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

对发展研究大学医学与健康科学学院的189名临床前学生进行了R-SPQ2F问卷调查。采用描述性和推断性统计方法,并进行了克朗巴哈α检验和因子分析。

结果

学生的平均年龄为22.69±0.18岁,60.8%(n = 115)为男性,42.3%(n = 80)处于医学培训的第二年。学生的深度学习方法平均得分(31.23±7.19)高于表层学习方法得分(22.62±6.48)。R-SPQ2F的结果证实了双因素解决方案的合理性,即深度学习方法和表层学习方法分别占方差的49.80%和33.57%。深度学习方法量表(克朗巴哈α系数为0.80)和表层学习方法量表(克朗巴哈α系数为0.76)及其子量表显示出良好的内部一致性。其结构效度与其他研究相当。

结论

我们的研究证实了R-SPQ2F在测量加纳临床前学生学习方法方面的结构效度和内部一致性。深度学习方法是学生中最主要的学习方法。该问卷可用于测量加纳和其他非洲国家学生 的学习方法。

相似文献

7

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验