Coombs R W, Collier A C, Allain J P, Nikora B, Leuther M, Gjerset G F, Corey L
Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98105.
N Engl J Med. 1989 Dec 14;321(24):1626-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198912143212402.
To determine which markers of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) replication correlate most closely with progressive disease, we compared the following: (1) the frequency of isolation of HIV from peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), (2) the frequency of isolation of the virus from cell-free plasma (plasma viremia), (3) the presence and titer of p24 antigen in plasma, and (4) the presence and titer of antibody to p24 antigen. We studied 213 persons who were positive for HIV antibody and 71 who were negative. HIV was isolated from PBMC from 207 of the 213 antibody-positive patients (97 percent), regardless of the clinical stage of the infection. Plasma viremia, in contrast, was correlated with the clinical stage of the infection. It was detected in 11 of 48 patients (23 percent) with asymptomatic infection, 32 of 71 (45 percent) in Class IVa of the Centers for Disease Control (those with AIDS-related complex), and 75 of 92 (82 percent) in Class IVc (those with AIDS) (P less than 0.01). Plasma HIV titers ranged from 10(0) to 10(4.3) and rose from a mean of 10(1.4) in asymptomatic patients to 10(2.5) in those with AIDS (P less than 0.02). Only 45 percent of patients with plasma viremia had HIV p24 antigen in either serum or plasma, and no correlation was found between the amount of p24 antigen in plasma and the plasma HIV titers. Follow-up tests indicated that plasma viremia was associated with a more marked decline in the CD4-lymphocyte cell count and the development of symptomatic disease (P = 0.034). We conclude that plasma viremia is a more sensitive virologic marker of the clinical stage of HIV infection and viral replication than the presence of p24 antigen or antibody in plasma. Not only whole blood but cell-free plasma from HIV-infected patients should be considered potentially infectious.
为了确定1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)复制的哪些标志物与疾病进展最密切相关,我们比较了以下各项:(1)从外周血单核细胞(PBMC)中分离HIV的频率,(2)从无细胞血浆中分离病毒的频率(血浆病毒血症),(3)血浆中p24抗原的存在及滴度,以及(4)针对p24抗原的抗体的存在及滴度。我们研究了213名HIV抗体阳性者和71名HIV抗体阴性者。在213名抗体阳性患者中,有207名(97%)从PBMC中分离出了HIV,无论感染的临床阶段如何。相比之下,血浆病毒血症与感染的临床阶段相关。在48名无症状感染患者中有11名(23%)检测到血浆病毒血症,在美国疾病控制中心IVa类(患有艾滋病相关综合征者)的71名患者中有32名(45%),在IVc类(患有艾滋病者)的92名患者中有75名(82%)(P<0.01)。血浆HIV滴度范围为10(0)至10(4.3),从无症状患者的平均10(1.4)上升至艾滋病患者的10(2.5)(P<0.02)。仅有45%的血浆病毒血症患者血清或血浆中有HIV p24抗原,且未发现血浆中p24抗原量与血浆HIV滴度之间存在相关性。随访检测表明,血浆病毒血症与CD4淋巴细胞计数更显著下降及出现症状性疾病相关(P = 0.034)。我们得出结论,与血浆中p24抗原或抗体的存在相比,血浆病毒血症是HIV感染临床阶段和病毒复制更敏感的病毒学标志物。不仅全血,HIV感染患者的无细胞血浆也应被视为具有潜在传染性。