Suppr超能文献

计算机辅助CT冠状动脉狭窄检测:与人工判读及定量冠状动脉造影的比较

Computer-aided CT coronary artery stenosis detection: comparison with human reading and quantitative coronary angiography.

作者信息

Rief Matthias, Kranz Anisha, Hartmann Lisa, Roehle Robert, Laule Michael, Dewey Marc

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Charité, Medical School, Humboldt-University and Free University, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany,

出版信息

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Dec;30(8):1621-7. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0513-x. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

Abstract

To evaluate computer-aided stenosis detection for computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA) in comparison with human reading and conventional coronary angiography (CCA) as the reference standard. 50 patients underwent CTA and CCA and out of these 44 were evaluable for computer-aided stenosis detection. The diagnostic performance of the software and of human reading were compared and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) served as the reference standard for the detection of significant stenosis (>50 %). Overall, three readers with high (reader 1), intermediate (reader 2) and low (reader 3) experience in cardiac CT imaging performed the manual CTA evaluation on a commercially available workstation, whereas the automated software processed the datasets without any human interaction. The prevalence of coronary artery disease was 41 % (18/44) and QCA indicated significant stenosis (>50 %) in 33 coronary vessels. The automated software accurately diagnosed 18 individuals with significant coronary artery disease (CAD), and correctly ruled out CAD in 10 patients. In summary the sensitivity of computer-aided detection was 100 %/94 % (per-patient/per-vessel) and the specificity was 38 %/70 %, the positive predictive value (PPV) was 53 %/42 % and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 100 %/98 %. In comparison, reader 1-3 showed per-patient sensitivities of 100/94/89 %, specificities of 73/69/50 %, PPVs of 72/68/55 % and NPVs of 100/95/87 %. Computer-aided detection yields a high NPV that is comparable to more experienced human readers. However, PPV is rather low and in the range of an unexperienced reader.

摘要

为评估计算机辅助检测在冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)中对狭窄的检测情况,并与人工判读以及作为参考标准的传统冠状动脉造影(CCA)进行比较。50例患者接受了CTA和CCA检查,其中44例可用于计算机辅助狭窄检测评估。比较了软件和人工判读的诊断性能,定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)作为检测显著狭窄(>50%)的参考标准。总体而言,三名在心脏CT成像方面经验丰富(读者1)、中等(读者2)和较少(读者3)的阅片者在商用工作站上进行了CTA的人工评估,而自动化软件在没有任何人工干预的情况下处理数据集。冠状动脉疾病的患病率为41%(18/44),QCA显示33支冠状动脉存在显著狭窄(>50%)。自动化软件准确诊断出18例患有显著冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的个体,并正确排除了10例患者的CAD。总之,计算机辅助检测的敏感性为100%/94%(按患者/按血管),特异性为38%/70%,阳性预测值(PPV)为53%/42%,阴性预测值(NPV)为100%/98%。相比之下,读者1 - 3的按患者敏感性分别为100/94/89%,特异性分别为73/69/50%,PPV分别为72/68/55%,NPV分别为100/95/87%。计算机辅助检测产生的NPV较高,与经验更丰富的人工阅片者相当。然而,PPV相当低,处于经验不足的阅片者范围内。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验